What are these physical quantites in electrodynamics?

[mma]

What physical quantities are these differential forms in classical electrodynamics?

I read the paper ofhttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0005084" (A gentle introduction to the foundations of classical electrodynamics: The meaning of the excitations (D,H) and the field strengths (E, B)).

The equation of charge conservation (eq. 2.5 in the paper) and the Faraday's induction law (eq. 5.2) are formally the same, except in the charge conservation appear 3-forms, while in Faraday's induction law 2-forms. I write these equations here.

(2.5)​

dj + \partial_t \rho = 0​

(5.2)​

dE + \partial_t B = 0​

Because of d\rho=0, from the Pioncaré lemma (cited in the paper as de Rham theorem) follows that (on a a contractible 3d manifold) the 3-form \rho is exact, i.e. there is a 2-form D that

(3.1)​

\rho = dD.​

The analogy would be that because of dB=0 (eq. 5.3 in the paper), from the Pioncaré lemma (cited in the paper as de Rham theorem) follows that (on a a contractible 2d manifold) the 2-form B is exact, i.e. there is a 1-form X[/itex] that<br /> <div style="text-align: right">(?.1)&#8203;</div><div style="text-align: center">B = dX.&#8203;</div>Later on, substititing (3.1) into (2.5) and using again the Poincaré lemma (alias de Rham theorem) we get that the j + \partial_tD 2-form (on a contractible 2d manifold) has an 1-form potential H, that is<br /> <div style="text-align: right">(3.2)&#8203;</div><div style="text-align: center">j + \partial_tD = dH.&#8203;</div>The analogy would be that substituting (?.1) into (5.2) and using again the Poincaré lemma (alias de Rham theorem) we get that the E + \partial_tX 1-form (on a contractible 1d manifold) has an 0-form potential Y, that is<br /> <div style="text-align: right">(?.2)&#8203;</div><div style="text-align: center">E + \partial_tX = dY.&#8203;</div>What physical quantities correspond to X and Y? Are they in use in electrodynamics? If not, then why not?

 

[mma]

I found them. X is the vector potential A, and Y is the scalar potential \phi.

Thanks.

 

[Ben Niehoff]

X would be the vector potential A. Y is the scalar potential phi. These equations are usually written

\vec B = \vec \nabla \times \vec A

\vec E = - \nabla \Phi - \frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t}

Edit: Oh, I see I am a few hours too late. :P