What are these physical quantites in electrodynamics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the physical quantities represented by differential forms in classical electrodynamics, specifically focusing on the equations of charge conservation and Faraday's induction law. The equations dj + ∂tρ = 0 and dE + ∂tB = 0 illustrate the relationship between 3-forms and 2-forms, respectively. The Poincaré lemma (de Rham theorem) is applied to show that the 3-form ρ is exact, leading to the identification of the vector potential A and scalar potential φ. The discussion concludes with the established equations for magnetic and electric fields, B = ∇ × A and E = -∇φ - ∂A/∂t.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms in mathematics
  • Familiarity with classical electrodynamics concepts
  • Knowledge of the Poincaré lemma and de Rham theorem
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus and field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Poincaré lemma in electrodynamics
  • Explore the role of vector potentials in electromagnetic theory
  • Research the applications of differential forms in physics
  • Examine the historical development of classical electrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of the mathematical foundations of electrodynamics and the relationships between physical quantities.

mma
Messages
270
Reaction score
5
What physical quantities are these differential forms in classical electrodynamics?

I read the paper ofhttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0005084" (A gentle introduction to the foundations of classical electrodynamics: The meaning of the excitations (D,H) and the field strengths (E, B)).

The equation of charge conservation (eq. 2.5 in the paper) and the Faraday's induction law (eq. 5.2) are formally the same, except in the charge conservation appear 3-forms, while in Faraday's induction law 2-forms. I write these equations here.

(2.5)​
[itex]dj + \partial_t \rho = 0[/itex]​
(5.2)​
[itex]dE + \partial_t B = 0[/itex]​

Because of [itex]d\rho=0[/itex], from the Pioncaré lemma (cited in the paper as de Rham theorem) follows that (on a a contractible 3d manifold) the 3-form [itex]\rho[/itex] is exact, i.e. there is a 2-form D that
(3.1)​
[itex]\rho = dD[/itex].​
The analogy would be that because of [itex]dB=0[/itex] (eq. 5.3 in the paper), from the Pioncaré lemma (cited in the paper as de Rham theorem) follows that (on a a contractible 2d manifold) the 2-form [itex]B[/itex] is exact, i.e. there is a 1-form [tex]X[/itex] that<br /> <div style="text-align: right">(?.1)​</div><div style="text-align: center">[itex]B = dX[/itex].​</div>Later on, substititing (3.1) into (2.5) and using again the Poincaré lemma (alias de Rham theorem) we get that the [itex]j + \partial_tD[/itex] 2-form (on a contractible 2d manifold) has an 1-form potential [itex]H[/itex], that is<br /> <div style="text-align: right">(3.2)​</div><div style="text-align: center">[itex]j + \partial_tD = dH[/itex].​</div>The analogy would be that substituting (?.1) into (5.2) and using again the Poincaré lemma (alias de Rham theorem) we get that the [itex]E + \partial_tX[/itex] 1-form (on a contractible 1d manifold) has an 0-form potential [itex]Y[/itex], that is<br /> <div style="text-align: right">(?.2)​</div><div style="text-align: center">[itex]E + \partial_tX = dY[/itex].​</div>What physical quantities correspond to [itex]X[/itex] and [itex]Y[/itex]? Are they in use in electrodynamics? If not, then why not?[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found them. [itex]X[/itex] is the vector potential [itex]A[/itex], and [itex]Y[/itex] is the scalar potential [itex]\phi[/itex].

Thanks.
 
X would be the vector potential A. Y is the scalar potential phi. These equations are usually written

[tex]\vec B = \vec \nabla \times \vec A[/tex]

[tex]\vec E = - \nabla \Phi - \frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t}[/tex]

Edit: Oh, I see I am a few hours too late. :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
999
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
23K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
44K