Testing What Background Is Needed to Work with Bose-Einstein Condensates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bose-einstein
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the academic background necessary for working with Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). The participant is currently enrolled in standard physics courses, including mechanics and electromagnetism, and is considering additional relevant courses such as statistical mechanics, quantum physics, and electromagnetic theory. They express uncertainty about the applicability of certain advanced courses in plasma and geophysics to BEC research. The participant also inquires about the feasibility of studying BECs at their current academic level and seeks free online resources for further learning. They clarify the structure of course levels, indicating that 100-level courses are for freshmen, while 200-level courses require calculus, and higher levels are for graduate studies. The consensus is that quantum physics and statistical mechanics are particularly relevant for understanding BECs.
Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
327
Is the new rock star physics, where do I sign up?

Seriously though, what kind of background does working with Bose-Einstein condensates require?

I'm taking the 2 standard 300 levels: mechanics and e&m, and math421: applied analysis this semester for physics degree classes.

Here are some of the optional courses that I think might be relevant based on what I've learned from these forums (and the web in general). (solid state, optics, and modern are all required):

Phys 614: Ice Physics
Phys 522: Statistical Mechanics
Phys 631: Electromagnetic Theory
Phys 651: Quantum Physics
Phys 660: Radiative Transfer


Things I don't think apply (but I've been wrong before:)

A handful of 600 plasma classes (basic, advanced, and methods of numerical simulation in fluids)

Phys 638 Digital Time Series Analysis
Phys 639 InSAR and its applications (this has got to be irrelevent)
Phys 640 Auroral Physics
Phys 645 Fund of Geophys Fluid Dynamics (right...)
Phys 650 Aeronomy (just in case I'm wrong!)
Phys 672 Magnetosphere Physics
Phys 673 Space Physics
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heh, I guess I shouild note that we don't have a condensate program here, so if anyone knows of any National Condensate authorities or general methods for getting a new department started, I'd be interested in even the farthest fetched of ideas.

I forgot to ask, additionally, if there is any point in even trying to study BE Condensates at my current academic level, and if there is, where's the free online resources? Hook a junker up! :-p
 
What do the different hundred-level classes mean?
 
eep said:
What do the different hundred-level classes mean?

I think the general trend is 100 level is for freshman's and nonmajors (like I'd take a 100 level anthropology class as a core requirement for a baccelors degree, but an anthropology major could probably start at a 200 level class. I started with a 200 level physics class. Generally they're the same, except the 200 has calculus.

I think the system is designed around a 6-year Master's Degree:

100 - Freshman
200 - Sophomore
300 - Junior
400 - Senior

500, 600 - Grad
 
I'd say quantum physics and stat. mech apply to bose-einstein condensates, but I'm just an undergrad myself
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top