What book should I get about algebra for physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for a deeper understanding of linear algebra and geometry for physics students, particularly when one semester is deemed insufficient. Recommendations for self-study resources include a comprehensive linear algebra book available at joshua.smcvt.edu, which offers theory, examples, and applications. Additional suggested texts are Artin's "Algebra," which is tailored for physics students, and Stillwell's "Naive Lie Theory," which connects calculus and linear algebra, both relevant to physics. The conversation also highlights online lecture resources from MIT and UCCS for further learning. Participants encourage sharing specific backgrounds to refine recommendations, emphasizing the importance of understanding linear algebra concepts for physics applications.
Tosh5457
Messages
130
Reaction score
28
Hi, I study Physics, and where I study we only have 1 semester of linear algebra & geometry. I don't know the importance of knowing more algebra than this on physics, but I think 1 semester is not enough (specially when we barely had time to study everything).

So what book do you recommend for self-study?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A wonderful book is joshua.smcvt.edu/linearalgebra/book.pdf
Doesn't only contain a lot of theory, but also examples, motivations and applications. If you know this book, then you could say that you know a lot of linear algebra!
 
Based on what you've said I would offer to suggestions:

1) Artin, Algebra - a thorough undergraduate algebra text covering topics in a way that may be appealing to physics students. There's an online video of one semester of algebra at MIT taught by Gross and using Artin as the text.

2) Stillwell, Naive Lie Theory - as he says in the preface "The really perfect sequel to calculus and linear algebra, however, would be a blend of the two -- a subject in which calculus throws light on linear algebra and vice versa. This perfect blend is Lie theory.", which is of considerable relevance in physics.
 
I second micromass's recommendation of Hefferon's linear algebra book.

Coxeter's Introduction to Geometry is a wonderful book (and don't be misled by the title -- it's an upper-division book for math majors).
 
xristy said:
Artin, Algebra - a thorough undergraduate algebra text covering topics in a way that may be appealing to physics students. There's an online video of one semester of algebra at MIT taught by Gross and using Artin as the text.
Actually it is Harvard:

http://www.extension.harvard.edu/openlearning/math222/

It is good, but moves pretty quick. If you want something that moves a little slower, try the lectures by Gene Abrams (Fall 2007) from UCCS:

http://www.uccs.edu/~math/vidarchive.html

However, this has less focus on Matrix groups than the Artin/Gross book/course mentioned above.

You may want to be more explicit about your background and interests so that people can give you better recommendations.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the suggestions, I liked the book micromass suggested very much. It explains the purpose of linear algebra's concepts and it has good examples, nice book :smile:
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
216
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top