What can the rest frame of a neutrino possibly mean?

Mosis
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
this thought was inspired by the recent news about FTL neutrinos. of course i suspect their instruments are broken and that no such thing happened, but regardless, the question stands:

it's easy to talk about the rest frame of classical objects where the notion of "trajectory" applies and velocity has an unambiguous meaning. but neutrinos and mesons are not little tennis balls zipping about. how does one make sense of boosting into the rest frame of a neutrino, when the "momentum" of such entities is defined by pointwise measurements and not a time derivative of a trajectory? or how does one make sense of the proper time of a meson, and their longer-than-expected observed lifetimes as evidence for relativistic time dilation? a meson is a quantum entity, not a ball! it does not follow a classical trajectory whose time derivative yields its momentum, and hence cannot be interpreted as "moving with velocity v" wrt an earthbound laboratory. i can't see how the relativistic notion of velocity and boosting into a rest frame can possibly apply to a meson, or neutrino, or any atomic entity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The concept of trajectory becomes fuzzy, but nevertheless valid to some extent. An analogy would be a trajectory of a short pulse of light in space, or of a ripple in a lake.
 
Don't you understand how the extreme dilation of the half-life of the muon was one of the first tests of Special Relativity? From the ground Frame of Reference, the muon's half-life is much longer, allowing them to survive all the way to the ground. From the rest Frame of a muon where its proper time is normal, the ground is much closer to it at the time of its formation so it quickly gets to the ground.
 
Mosis said:
how does one make sense of boosting into the rest frame of a neutrino, when the "momentum" of such entities is defined by pointwise measurements and not a time derivative of a trajectory?
Regardless of whether it is a pointwise measurement or the time derivative of a trajectory there is only one frame where the momentum is 0. That frame is the rest frame.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top