What causes an object to eventually come to rest after bouncing indefinitely?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shoku Z
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An object dropped from a height will bounce indefinitely due to the coefficient of restitution, C, which determines the speed of each subsequent bounce. The velocity after each bounce can be expressed as v_n = C^n * u, suggesting that theoretically, the object never comes to rest as n approaches infinity. However, in practical scenarios, factors such as energy loss due to air resistance and surface imperfections cause the object to eventually stop bouncing. The discussion highlights the limitations of applying Newton's laws in idealized conditions and emphasizes the importance of considering real-world phenomena. Ultimately, while mathematical models suggest perpetual motion, physical realities lead to the object's eventual rest.
Shoku Z
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Suppose that an object is dropped from a height 'H'.The coefficient of restitution be C.
Now,C=v_1/u.Therefore,v_1=Cu
This v_1 is the speed with which it bounces.Then,it strikes the floor again.
And again,C=v_2/v_1

v_2= C.v_1 = C^2 u
Similarly,v_3= C^3u
v_4=C^4u and so on.

Suppose that the ball comes to rest after bouncing up n times.
Therefore,
v_n = 0
C^n.u = 0
And this is only possible when n tends to infinity.In other words,it never comes to rest.But,practically,this is not the case.How come?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all coefficient of restitution is
C=v/u simply in case of bouncing of a rigid ball on a rigid surface.Not , C=(v-1)/u.
Then, also this paradox arises as you mentioned .
we must not forget that we apply Newton's laws in some idealized cases. And this application may seem to be miraculous some time. But as we go into detail, not neglecting many phenomenons, then gradually we come close to physical reality.
In this case of bouncing object , we assumed it to be point particle. If we consider it to big enough ,then also bouncing height will never be equal to zero mathematically.But, the height achieved after several bouncing will be so small that we will not be able to distinguish it from
atomic motions.
 
No,its no v-1, its v_1.I don't know how to use subscripts on mobile.v_1 is the velocity with which the ball bounces up after striking the floor 1st time.
v_2 2nd time
v_n nth time
 
Then also logic is same,isn't it.
 
Yeah,just want to make it clear!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top