What causes changes in electric field within a circuit?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric fields within a circuit, particularly focusing on the differences in voltage drops across resistors and wires. Participants explore the relationship between electric fields, voltage drops, and energy transformations in a simple DC circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in visualizing how voltage drops differ across components, questioning whether a greater voltage drop across a resistor implies a greater electric field in that region.
  • Another participant clarifies that voltage drop is not a change in electric field but rather a loss of potential energy as current moves through passive circuit elements.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of a uniform electric field, with one participant suggesting that if the electric field were uniform, the current would not be uniform due to the differing forces required to move current through resistors compared to wires.
  • One participant proposes that the energy lost in a resistor is converted to thermal energy rather than increasing the kinetic energy of the current, seeking confirmation of their understanding.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of remembering that power in a circuit is proportional to the product of voltage drop and current, highlighting the differences in power dissipation between wires and resistors.
  • There is a discussion about the consequences of non-uniform current, suggesting that if more current leaves an area than enters, it would create a charge accumulation that produces an electric field, contradicting the assumption of a uniform electric field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the relationship between electric fields, voltage drops, and energy transformations. Some concepts remain contested, particularly regarding the implications of uniform versus non-uniform electric fields and current.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about uniformity in electric fields and current, which may not hold in all scenarios. The relationship between electric fields, voltage drops, and energy transformations is complex and not fully resolved in the conversation.

chad mcpeek
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So I'm having trouble visualizing how voltage drops more within different parts of a circuit, such as a resistor vs. wire. I know all the general equations but the concept is hard for me to comprehend and I am stuck on one notion. So, say you have a simple DC circuit with just a resistor and wire connecting the two ends. Since the resistor has much more resistance than the wire, the drop in potential will be much greater across the resistor than the wire. Consequently, since the drop in potential per unit length is higher for the resistor wouldn't that mean the electric field is greater in the resistor? but how could the electric field be greater and what causes the change in E field?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand it correctly, voltage drop is not a change in the electric field, it is a loss of potential energy.

From wiki (underlining mine):
Voltage drop describes how the supplied energy of a voltage source is reduced as electric current moves through the passive elements (elements that do not supply voltage) of an electric circuit.
 
chad mcpeek said:
Consequently, since the drop in potential per unit length is higher for the resistor wouldn't that mean the electric field is greater in the resistor?
Yes, assuming the wire and resistor were equal in length.

chad mcpeek said:
but how could the electric field be greater and what causes the change in E field?
Assume the contrary. What would happen if the E field were uniform? Think about Ohms law, currents, and conservation of charge.
 
Okay I think I'm starting to understand. so if the electric field were uniform then the current going the wire would not be uniform because it takes more force to move current through a resistor than the wires? and if the electric field were uniform then the change in potential energy would also be uniform. Since it takes more force, and therefore a greater E field, to move through a resistor then it should cause more change in potential energy. However instead of converting that electric potential energy into kinetic in the form of a faster current, it gets converted to thermal energy? Am I on the right track?
 
itchybrain said:
AT: I see that now, and agree.

Is the decrease in energy as the rays go through more atmosphere negligible, or a pertinent factor?

chad mcpeek said:
Okay I think I'm starting to understand. so if the electric field were uniform then the current going the wire would not be uniform because it takes more force to move current through a resistor than the wires? and if the electric field were uniform then the change in potential energy would also be uniform. Since it takes more force, and therefore a greater E field, to move through a resistor then it should cause more change in potential energy. However instead of converting that electric potential energy into kinetic in the form of a faster current, it gets converted to thermal energy? Am I on the right track?

You are getting closer, but please forget about electrons and kinetic energy when thinking about electric current. The flow of energy (I.e. Power) in an electric circuit is proportional to voltage drop times current. V*I. That is what you should remember.

When the same current flows through the wire and resistor, the voltage drop across the ends of the wire is nearly zero, but the voltage drop across the resistor is not zero. Therefore, the power dissipated in the wire is zero*current and the power dissipated in the resistor is V*current.
 
chad mcpeek said:
the current going the wire would not be uniform because it takes more force to move current through a resistor than the wires?
Yes, this is the key point. Think about what would happen if there were a non uniform current.

If more current is leaving an area than is entering then that region would become progressively more negatively charged. That would produce an E field which would invalidate the original assumption of uniform E field. In fact, this charge accumulation would continue until the current became uniform and the E field non-uniform in exactly the fashion that you first noticed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
12K