What causes errors in experimental calculations of x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter j-lee00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error
AI Thread Summary
Errors in experimental calculations of x arise from inaccuracies in the variables s, a, and b. The derived formula for relative error is Δx/x = sqrt((1/(4ab)^2)*[(bΔa/a)^2+(aΔb/b)^2]+(Δs/s)^2). A participant questions the absence of "z" in the final result, suspecting a typo. The logarithmic transformation of the equation clarifies the relationship between the variables, leading to a differential expression that incorporates the errors. It is noted that "z" does not contribute to the error, as it has no associated variability.
j-lee00
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
x = s(sqrt((2(a+b))/zab)

There is error in s, a and b

show the required result is

\Deltax/x = sqrt( (1/(4ab)^2)*[(b\Deltaa/a)^2+(a\Deltab/b)^2]+(\Deltas/s)^2
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What happened to the "z" in the denominator? I don't see it in the result? Is it a typo?

Try this: take the logarithm of both sides so
ln(x)= ln(s)+ (1/2)[ln(2)+ ln(a+b)- ln(a)- ln(b)- ln(z)]

Now take the differential:
dx/x= ds/s+ (1/2)[(da+db)/(a+b)- da/a- db/b- dz/z] and replce each "d" with "\Delta.
 
z has no error associated with it
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top