What Causes Lattice-Like Aberrations in a Gaussian Laser Beam Path?

  • Thread starter Thread starter silin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical
AI Thread Summary
Lattice-like aberrations in a Gaussian laser beam may result from several factors, including dirty optical elements or issues with the laser itself, such as feedback or coherence length problems. The discussion highlights that the aberration becomes pronounced when both lenses are present in the optical path. A suggestion was made to verify that the polarization preserving fiber is indeed single mode at 470 nm. The user ultimately determined that the issue likely stems from dirt within the microscope. Regular patterns in the aberration were noted, indicating a potential systematic issue.
silin
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know what can be the reason for such an aberration of initially Gaussian shaped laser beam (see attached picture)? Optical elements in the light path: linearly polarized diode 470nm laser, single mode polarization conserving fiber, collimator, mirror, lens, round 50 micrometer pinhole, lens, filter for 470nm line, dichroic beam splitter reflecting 470nm light, mirror, Olympus IX70 microscope. The picture is the beam profile after the tube lens in the microscope. I have already checked all elemets for causing this aberration by removing them one by one, the problem with this lattice like beam shape becomes really pronounced when I leave both lenses in the optical path, but it loos really strange, as if some kind of diffraction pattern. If somebody has any idea please tell, it´s pretty urgent.
 

Attachments

  • beam.JPG
    beam.JPG
    30.9 KB · Views: 500
Science news on Phys.org
Wow, looks like you're getting some structure there.

It's not clear from your initial post whether you have a laser cavity set up. If you do, then it is possible there are higher order transverse modes being excited.

If not, it is probably a dirty optical element (from my past experience this is the cause of 90% of such problems). Failing this, I would think the laser itself would be the next thing to check out, make sure there is no feedback into the laser and make sure you are operating within the laser's coherence length.

Beyond this, it's tough to diagnose something like this without a detailed knowledge of the system, as there are lots of little subtlelties that might come into play.

Claude.
 
Claude,

Could this be, or is it already, used to check the cleanliness of a multi surface optical system? Do you have more information about it?
 
Integral,

Not to my knowledge. For a precise measurement on the cleanliness of a surface, there are several tools we use, all of which are fairly expensive, They include scanning electron microscopes, optical profilers and Differential Interferance Contrast (DIC) microscopes.

Silin,

Another though came to mind; Double check that your polarisation preserving fibre is single mode at 470 nm.

Claude.
 
Thank you for the replies. I have done what you said and found that the problem is in the microscope. Probably there is some dirt in it, but it's amazing that the pattern is so regular.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top