What Causes the Non-Circular Distribution of Magnetic Fields in Steel Ducts?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the distribution of magnetic fields in steel ducts, particularly in the context of analyzing magnetic losses using FEMM software. Participants explore the unexpected non-circular distribution of the magnetic field generated by three-phase high voltage lines, questioning the influence of material properties such as permeability and conductivity on the magnetic field behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the magnetic field generated by an infinite wire should be circular, but observes a dramatic decrease in field intensity within the duct, followed by an increase.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the system's geometry and the specifics of the FEMM software being used, suggesting that the current in the three-phase conductors sums to zero.
  • A participant describes the duct's dimensions and material properties, indicating that the magnetic field is low inside the duct and questioning the dependence of the magnetic field on environmental factors.
  • One participant suggests that induced currents inside the duct may mirror the phase currents and proposes calculating the skin depth to understand its effect on the magnetic field.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the impact of changing the duct's permeability and conductivity on the magnetic field, noting that low conductivity should minimize eddy current effects.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between the magnetic field H and the material's permeability, with one asserting that the formula for magnetic fields generated by currents does not include relative permeability.
  • Concerns are raised about the attachment of the duct's top and its potential effect on the magnetic field distribution, with suggestions for numerical testing to assess the impact of surface conductance discontinuities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the factors influencing the magnetic field distribution, particularly regarding the roles of permeability and conductivity. There is no consensus on the exact reasons for the observed magnetic field behavior within the duct.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions and parameters, including duct dimensions, material properties, and the nature of the currents involved, which may not be fully documented or understood. The discussion highlights the complexity of the magnetic field interactions in this specific setup.

Willy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all, first time on this forum.

I know this may sound like a stupid question, but how does the magnetic field distribute?

I am working on FEMM and i am analysing magnetic losses on steel ducts. I was checking the flux density and the magnetic field distributions and i was surprised when i did not see a circular distribution of the magnetic field (magnetic field generated from 3ph HV line).

Now, i have studied that an infinite wire can generate a circular magnetic field according to the equation: I/(2*pi*r). As there are no material parameters i have concluded that the magnetic field distribution would be circular INDIPENDTLY FROM THE ENVIRONMENT conditions.

i was not expecting a circular distribution obviously, but for sure the field intensity would decrease linearly with the distance. This did not happen: the magnetic field dramatically decreases in the duct and then increases again.

Why does it decrease in the steel duct? i have changed the conductivity to 0 but nothing changed. Though it changes when i modify the permeability.

I know flux density depends on the permeability of the material, but the magnetic field should not be influenced by it.

What am i missing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

It would really help if we knew the geometry of the system you are analysing.
Please post a sketch or plot of the geometry.

What FEMM software are you using?
What are the ducts, how big are they?
What passes through the ducts?
How does the 3PH HV generate the field?
I would expect the current in the 3PH conductors would sum to zero.
 
Hi

I am using FEMM 4.2.

The duct thickness is 3mm. Its permeability is 37. Inside the duct there is only air (and of course the cables), the duct is surrounded of soil(peat,loam). In this model the conductivity of the duct is not 0, i checked if changing the value to 0 would have an effect: nothing changed.

3ph HV cables (copper) are installed in the duct . In each cable flows a peak current equal to sqrt(2)*800 A 120° phased from each other. So yes: the sum of the three currents is equal to zero.

img duct.jpg

The image above shows the magnetic field intensity of the model.
Probably would not be easy to see, but in the duct the magnetic field is really low. So it abruptly decreases in the duct and then it increases again. The next image will show the magnetic field intensity near the duct (the left part is the magnetic field inside the duct):
img.jpg

I have basically two questions: Does the magnetic field H depend on the environment? If so, what affects it?

Thanks in advance.
 
The currents induced on the inside of the duct will circulate with the phases. The inside of the duct is a mirror of the phase currents.

Work out the skin depth in the duct material and compare that with the duct wall thickness.

Some of the currents induced on the inside of the duct will generate magnetic field that escapes to the outside of the duct. That may explain the (yellow) small circulating field outside the duct.
 
1630607184805.png

Changed the conductivity of the duct to 10^-9, so i guess the eddy currents are not affecting the magnetic field that much. Though, if i change the permeability...

1630607778919.png


Permeability of the duct=1, conductivity=10^-9. For what i know, this does not make sense.

I would really appreciate if anyone could tell me what is going on.
 
Willy said:
I would really appreciate if anyone could tell me what is going on.
The feeling is mutual. You know what assumptions you have made, and what is undocumented.
We can only guess.
What are the duct dimensions ?
What do the line graphs show ?
Is "distance, mm" = radius from centre of conductors or an arbitrary section across what ?
At what mm length in the line graphs is the inside and outside of the conduit ?

I believe I can see the rotating field in the colour plot, can you ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
The two graphs show the magnetic field from the inside of the duct through the duct going outside the duct.
The problem unit measurement is mm, working at 50 Hz.
Duct is 490x490x3.

The rotating field is not the problem, it makes sense that is circular as the currents are balanced, the fact is: if you take the magnetic field formula generated by currents, the relative permeability does not appear.

Though, the magnetic field in the duct changes if i change the permeability of the duct (from 4 to 7mm in the graphs). Conductivity has a really low impact on the magnetic field, but i could expect that as the eddy currents would generate an opposite magnetic field.
 
Willy said:
Probably would not be easy to see, but in the duct the magnetic field is really low. So it abruptly decreases in the duct and then it increases again. The next image will show the magnetic field intensity near the duct (the left part is the magnetic field inside the duct):
How is the top of the duct attached? The internal circulating current wave appears to escape through the gap, to then flow over the outside of the duct. I guess that is generating the field outside the duct. Maybe you could test that by welding the cap numerically onto the conduit, so it would not leak from the internal surface conductance discontinuity.

Willy said:
Conductivity has a really low impact on the magnetic field, but i could expect that as the eddy currents would generate an opposite magnetic field.
The more conductive the sheet, the shallower are the eddy currents, and the more efficient is the surface as a mirror. But the energy reflected can never exceed the incident energy. So the sum of incident and reflected can approach zero, but it can never go negative, even though it is a counter current.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
968
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K