What Causes the Water Droplet Tower Effect?

AI Thread Summary
The water droplet tower effect occurs when a droplet impacts a larger body of water, creating a temporary upward column of water. This phenomenon is attributed to the conversion of kinetic energy from the falling droplet into potential energy, resulting in oscillations between these energy forms. The separation observed at the top of the tower can be explained by the rebound energy of the droplet, which can propel additional droplets upward. The initial collision displaces water, and as the energy dissipates, the surrounding water fills the void, sustaining the tower effect. Understanding this effect highlights the complex interactions of fluid dynamics during droplet impacts.
ChrisHarvey
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering if anyone could explain the phenomenon seen when a water droplet falls into larger expanse of water (i.e. the kind of water 'tower', like in the picture)?

It's something I've wondered about for a while, and I've never managed to come up with a satisfactory answer myself. What's more, it's a common front cover for fluid dynamics textbooks, yet it never seems to be explained!

Thanks,
Chris
 

Attachments

  • Image20.jpg
    Image20.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 484
Physics news on Phys.org
I was thinking along the lines of the kinetic energy of the falling droplet being converted into the potential energy of water in the 'tower', before being oscillating backwards and forwards between potental and kinetic energy of the ripples / waves. However, this doesn't seem to explain everything to me. Why do you often see separation in the 'tower' (near the top), with sometimes several drops of water?
 
If there is enough energy in the initial collision, the rebound has enough energy to send a droplet back up.
 
When the droplet hits the surface it displaces water right? so after that energy has dispersed, water fills back in the space and creates this tower effect..Same thing when you do a cannonball into the pool haha..
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top