What country is really the best for the individual?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kerrie
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of which country is considered the best for individuals, focusing on political aspects, quality of life, and personal preferences. Participants share their opinions on various countries, citing factors such as freedom, opportunity, and social systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a preference for Canada, citing its positive qualities compared to the U.S.
  • Others mention that many industrialized, modern democratic states, including Western Europe, the U.S., Canada, Japan, and South Korea, provide sufficient freedom and opportunity for a good life.
  • Norway is highlighted as a top country based on a survey, while the Netherlands is noted for its healthcare and social security system.
  • One participant argues that Japan is not the most egalitarian society for women, suggesting New Zealand as a better option due to its history of female leadership.
  • Some express skepticism about the quality of life in Africa, Asia, and Central/South America, while others challenge these views by highlighting the beauty and opportunities in those regions.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the concept of "free range socialists" and the political climate in various countries, particularly Australia.
  • Participants discuss the differences between parliamentary and tripartite systems in relation to leadership selection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which country is the best for individuals. Multiple competing views are presented, with some advocating for specific countries based on personal experiences and preferences, while others challenge these opinions.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal biases and experiences, which may limit the scope of the discussion. Participants express varying degrees of familiarity with countries outside their own, influencing their perspectives.

  • #31
Sorry to get off topic again, but I have to defend myself. You guys wholly misconstrued what I said. I said:
...if you charge a reasonable amount for a product but pay the workers little or nothing, of course the GDP is going to be big.
(I just added the italics.)
The italicized part is important. What I mean is that you sell a product for about the average amount. Your material costs will be the same no matter what we'll assume. But you pay the workers very little. (Oh, and by 'you' I mean the collective business owners of a country.) From this we can get a vague inequality:
[I-(M+w)]>[I-(M+W)]
where I is the income from your product, M is the cost of materials, the parts inside the brackets on each side is your profit, w is the very little you pay the workers, and W is the minimum wage you should feel is ethical to pay your workers (but obviously don't).
What this shows is that you, the collective business owners of some country, will benefit by paying your workers very little and pocketing the cash you saved by doing so.
This I feel is self evident, one really needn't take a class to get it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
You don't know how to calculate GDP. It is the sum total of all goods and services. The value of the goods is considered to be the sale price minus production cost. The production costs also contribute to GDP. If costs are low, the good value is high. Whether you pay your workers a little or a lot, the effect on GDP is determined by the final price charged for the goods.

Njorl
 
  • #33
Shanghai! Hong Kong and Guangzhou

Back to the original question ("what country is really the best for the individual?")

Take a young, entrepreneurial person looking for a place to make a small fortune through her business smarts, and wanting a place with material comforts, a night-life, a buzz.

Despite the fact that Shanghai and Guangzhou are in the People's Republic of China, where the Chinese Communist Party is in charge (an avowedly socialist group), they should both be high on our individual's list.

In fact, they may be better places than Hong Kong; the mood in HK is nowhere near as upbeat as in the other two cities,
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
76
Views
7K
Replies
19
Views
3K