What Defines a Line as an Asymptote?

AI Thread Summary
An asymptote is defined as a straight line that a function approaches but never touches, with specific conditions for vertical and horizontal asymptotes. A vertical asymptote occurs when the limit of the function approaches infinity as x approaches a certain value. Horizontal asymptotes are established when the difference between the function and a linear function approaches zero as x approaches infinity or negative infinity. The discussion clarifies that horizontal asymptotes can be represented by setting the slope (m) to zero in the linear equation. Understanding these definitions helps in identifying asymptotic behavior in various functions.
lntz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i'm having some trouble understanding the definition of an asymptote, or rather the conditions that must be met in order for a line to be one.

I have;

"Let f : A \longrightarrow B be a function and A \subset R, B \subset R. A straight line is called an asymptote if one of the following conditions is met;

1. The straight line is vertical (to the x-axis) and goes through a point (x_{0}, 0)
and we have lim_{x \longrightarrow x_{0}} |f(x)| = \infty

2. The straight line can be described as an affine linear function, that is as g(x) = mx + c and we have either lim_{x \longrightarrow \infty} (f(x) - g(x)) = 0 or lim_{x \longrightarrow - \infty} (f(x) - g(x)) = 0"

I think I understand the first condition. As the values of x approach some value x_{0} the value of y tends towards infinity. i.e it tends towards a vertical straight line through (x_{0}, 0). This fits the mental idea I had of an asymptote, but can it be applied to a function that has a horizontal asymptote such as the exponential function for example.

Perhaps this is where the second condition comes in, to cover those cases, but I am struggling to see what is going on...

Does it say that as x tends towards a value (x_{0} the y value of the functions are equal since their difference is zero?

I don't see how this covers the scenario of horizontal asymptotes unless it's ok to turn the argument around the other way.

Thanks for any help you can give, and sorry for my bad LaTeX limits...

Jacob.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Horizonatal asymptotes are covered if you let m = 0 in the equation g(x) = mx + c.

BTW, I changed all of your [ tex ] tags to [ itex ] (for inline LaTeX). The [ tex ] tags render their contents on a separate line, which breaks up expressions that probably shouldn't be broken up.

Also, I find it easier to use ## in place of [ itex ] and $$ in place of [ tex ]. Whichever one you use, put a pair of these symbols at the front and rear of the expression you're working with.
 
Hey, this is how I picture it, may help you..

Vertical asymptote:

lim_{x \longrightarrow x_{0}} |f(x)| = \infty where x_{0} is a critical point.Horizontal asymptote:

lim_{x \longrightarrow \infty} f(x) = any finite number
And you shall check +\infty and -\infty
 
Last edited:
A the line ##y=mx+b## is a slant asymptote for a function ##f(x)## if ##\lim_{x\to\infty}[f(x)-mx-b]=0##.
You can replace the line with another polynomial for other types of asymptotes at infinity. Vertical and horizontal asymptotes are in others' posts.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top