What Defines the Cooling Efficiency of Motor Oils?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_Kid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling Fluid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the cooling efficiency of various motor oils, particularly comparing straight oils like SAE30 to multi-grade oils such as 5W30. Key properties under consideration include specific heat capacity, viscosity, thermal conductivity, and density, as well as the potential need for forced circulation in testing. The proposed testing apparatus aims to measure the rate of temperature change in an aluminum plate to evaluate how effectively different oils absorb and transfer heat. There is also a consideration of the challenges oils face at elevated temperatures and their dual functions in engine performance. Overall, the goal is to identify which oil serves as a better heat sink in practical applications.
Physics_Kid
Messages
172
Reaction score
11
hi all. i am trying to formulate some testing of different motor oils. i am looking to document which oils have better cooling properties. i read some info years back that a straight oil like SAE30 actually cools better than say a 5w30, reason being is because the multi-grade uses long chained polymers which uncoil as they get hotter which affects the cooling abilty of the oil.

but before i design my test apparatus i want to get clarity on what makes for a better cooling fluid. the specific heat is one property of a substance, but that alone to me does not define a better cooling fluid. is there a property of fluids that define endothermic and exothermic rates? in other words, if a fluid flows over a metal channel which property of fluids defines which fluid absorbs the most energy given a fixed flow rate of the fluid?

i am thinking my apparatus will be something like this. a rectangular box, ~12" on the long side, ~4" on the short side, and about ~6" tall to hold fluid around 4"-5" high. this "box" is made of 1" thick rigid foam board with a 1/4thick aluminum plate siliconed to one end of the box. on the opposite end will be an immersion heater. i will measure external temp of the aluminum vs time. i am figuring the better cooling fluid will be the one which shows the rate of temp change to be the fastest regardless of what the equilibrium temp is.

does this make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Important factors will include be viscosity, specific heat capacity, operating temperature, thermal conductivity and even density.
If you want a good test I think you should consider forced circulation. Not many engines use simple convection cooling - the oil is at least 'splashed' around.
 
What's your definition of "better"?

Have a think about the limits of performance. For example water makes a good cooling media under the right conditions but it gives you other problems to solve at temperatures over 100C. What problems does oil have at different temperatures? Is oil being used for other reasons and are they impacted by heat?
 
ok,

1) well, i want to see how well the fluid absorbs heat (energy), moves it from one side to the other, and then gives it up to the aluminum heat sink on the other end (similar to the oil in an engine block). do i need to use a circulator for this test? i guess i am testing for thermal conductivity, i cannot find this spec for any motor oil and the makers won't tell me.
2) "better" - i guess my definition is the fluid that acts as the better heat sink.
 
ah, thanks much for those links, that helps me quite a bit. however, i do want to compare synthetics.

a few years back i was reading an article about pure water being best for a racing engine (i was investigating those wetter wetter products, etc), in that article it had a snippet on the order of "...and using straight oil grade vs multi-grade also helps cool an engine better".
 
Last edited:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top