What determines how much electricity is in one's body/brain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJ2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of "bioelectric content" in humans, questioning its definition and relevance. It is noted that the term lacks a clear quantitative basis and is not widely applicable outside of fictional contexts, such as video games. The conversation explores the relationship between neuronal connections, neurotransmitters, and ion channel currents, suggesting that individuals with more complex brain structures, like Einstein, may have higher levels of these biological components. Additionally, it highlights that larger individuals naturally possess more bioelectric content due to their larger nervous systems. The use of PET scans is mentioned as a method to observe brain activity, indicating that focused mental effort increases glucose consumption in specific brain areas, which can be tracked through radioactive tagging.
PJ2001
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Some people have a bioelectrical content that is greater/lesser than others. Why is that?

Thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Simply the number of ions but no relation with electricity since there is no circuit.
 
This question is not well-defined. We have no quantitative notion of "bioelectric content" that can be applied to people.

At least not outside the video game Deus Ex... ;)
 
What do you mean by bioelectric content? Are you talking about the neuronal plexus in the brain and the corresponding neurotransmitters and associated ion channel currents? Certainly, people like Einstein had more neuronal connections which infers more 'circuitry' and thus the amount of associated neurotransmitters and ions needed to facilitate his thoughts throughout his brain would be greater than the average human. Of course if you have a person who weighs 100lb. vs. a person who weighs 300lb., the 300lb. person's body would have more 'bioelectric content' since their nervous system would be larger as required by their larger volume/mass.

Of course its been known for many years via PET scans that concentrating hard uses more glucose in the brain than simply relaxing. We can see this in PET scans because researchers affix a radioactive tag to glucose solution before the scan and the patient drinks it. Then the PET scan picks up the radioactive signature of the glucose as it concentrates itself in various parts of the brain, dependent of course on which part your brain you are using most at the time of the scan.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top