What Determines the Gradient of ln(ax) for Different Values of a?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JizzaDaMan
  • Start date Start date
JizzaDaMan
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
It's easy to show that \frac{dy}{dx} of y = ln(ax) where a \in ℝ, a > 0 is always \frac{1}{x} :

y = ln(ax)
y = ln(a) + ln(x)

ln(a) is constant so its derivative is 0, and the derivative of ln(x) is \frac{1}{x}.
Hence:

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{1}{x}

Attached is an image of y=ln(ax) with a = 1,2,3,4,5. It also shows all of their derivatives to be the same (the curve at the top). But they are clearly different curves! There must be some point at which one has a larger gradient than the others?? What am I missing?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2013-11-30 12:27:43.jpg
    Screenshot from 2013-11-30 12:27:43.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 640
Physics news on Phys.org
JizzaDaMan said:
But they are clearly different curves! There must be some point at which one has a larger gradient than the others?? What am I missing?
The curves are just shifted upwards/downwards with respect to each other. This is not easy to see in the graph (as their non-vertical "distance" is not constant), but it is right. And constant offsets do not show up in the derivative.
 
oh of course! :D I feel a bit stupid now :P I guess they're shifted up by ln(a) right?
 
That's right.
 
Also, you don't "take dy/dx" of some function. dy/dx already represents the derivative of y with respect to x.
 
Back
Top