What Determines the Relative Velocity of Two Attracting Masses?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the relative velocity of two masses attracting each other through gravitational force. The participant initially uses the reduced mass and the Work-Energy theorem but encounters a sign error leading to an imaginary velocity. The correct expression for relative velocity is derived as Vrel = [2G(M+m)/d]^(1/2). The importance of checking units and signs in calculations is emphasized, particularly in relation to the work done on or by the system. Understanding the sign conventions for work is crucial in avoiding errors in similar physics problems.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 particles of masses M and m are initially at rest and infinitely separated. When they move towards each other due to gravitational attraction, what is their relative velocity at any instant?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The problem may be treated in centre of mass system co-ordinates. Therefore,
reduced mass R= Mm/(M+m)

Kinetic energy = 0.5RVrel2

Work done in moving masses from infinite distance to a separation distance d can be found by integration.
W.D. = -GMm/d

Now by using Work-Energy theorem,
K.E.f - K.E.i = W.D

0.5RVrel2 - 0 = -GMm/d

Vrel = [-2G(M+m)/d]^1/2
but the answer is
[2G(M+m)/d]^1/2

Where am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Using Work-Energy theorem, you can write
K.E.f - K.E.i = W.D = P.E.i - P.E.f
 


Thanks!
 


Abdul Quadeer said:
Vrel = [-2G(M+m)/d]^1/2

Where am I wrong?
<rant>
It's always a good idea to do a sanity check on your answer. Check your units, check your signs, create a somewhat simpler problem that should give approximately the correct answer, etc. You won't always have an answer book against which you can compare your result. Get in the habit of double-checking everything and you won't be lost when the answer book disappears.
</rant>

In this problem, G, M, m, and d are all positive quantities. That means your radical is negative, and that in turn means your relative velocity is imaginary. Now does an imaginary velocity make a bit of sense here? It does not of course, so that means you did something wrong.

Your mistake is a sign error in work. Work is just one of those things you just have to be careful about with respect to sign. Is positive work work that is done by the system or work that is done on the system? I can't tell you which one is right because both schemes are used.
 


D H said:
<rant>
It's always a good idea to do a sanity check on your answer. Check your units, check your signs, create a somewhat simpler problem that should give approximately the correct answer, etc. You won't always have an answer book against which you can compare your result. Get in the habit of double-checking everything and you won't be lost when the answer book disappears.
</rant>

Thanks for your advise. I will keep that in mind.

Is positive work work that is done by the system or work that is done on the system? I can't tell you which one is right because both schemes are used.

I know that the sign scheme for work done on the system (+ve) or by the system (-ve) is applied in the case of thermodynamics (gases). I never knew we could apply that rule here also.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top