What Determines the Stability of Dihalocarbenes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GPhab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stability
AI Thread Summary
The stability of dihalocarbenes is influenced by the presence of electron-donating groups that help delocalize electrons into an empty p-orbital. Despite this, CF2 is noted as the most stable dihalocarbenes, raising questions about the factors contributing to its stability. The discussion highlights a lack of responses, indicating a need for more engagement on the topic. The original poster expresses frustration over the delay in replies, suggesting a desire for collaborative problem-solving. Understanding the stability order of dihalocarbenes remains a complex issue that requires further exploration.
GPhab
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Predict the stability order of dihalocarbenes.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm lost. Just give me a hint and I'll see if I can get it figured out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dihalocarbenes exist in singlet state. Wiki says that singlet carbenes can be stabilized by electron donating groups as they help in delocalizing the electrons into an empty p-orbital. So why is CF2 the most stable. It has been almost 48 hours since the last post. Why isn't anybody replying?(Maybe it was because I wasn't successful in convincing anyone of you that I sincerely attempted this question.)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top