What Distinguishes Real Power from Reactive Power in Electrical Systems?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the distinction between real power and reactive power in electrical systems, exploring theoretical and practical implications. Participants examine definitions, equations, and the significance of reactive power in AC circuits, including its role in power factor and electrical efficiency.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define real power as V*I*cos(teta) and reactive power as V*I*sin(teta), noting that reactive power averages to zero over an AC cycle while real power does not.
  • Others argue that reactive power, despite doing no work, is crucial for system stability, citing historical events like the 2003 blackout as evidence of its importance.
  • A participant provides a detailed explanation of how power behaves in DC versus AC circuits, emphasizing the role of inductance and reactance in creating impedance and affecting power factor.
  • Some contributions highlight that reactive power involves current flow and associated heating, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased costs for consumers with poor power factors.
  • One participant describes reactive power as energy flow related to the creation and collapse of magnetic and electric fields, illustrating the dynamic nature of energy in AC systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement on the definitions of real and reactive power, but there is no consensus on the implications of reactive power, its desirability, or its impact on electrical systems. Various viewpoints on its significance and effects remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference historical practices related to power factor correction and the implications of reactive power on electrical infrastructure, indicating a complex relationship that is not fully resolved in the conversation.

sreedhar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the exact difference between real an reactive power?


Homework Equations



As far as i know

real power =V*I*cos(teta)
reactive power = V*I*sin(teta)


The Attempt at a Solution


I have heard, in physics reactive power is not considered as its work is zero?
But how significant it in electrical field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reactive power is the part that just goes back in forth in the circuit. Sometimes it is positive and sometimes negative, but over the whole AC cycle it averages to zero. Real power averages to something positive over the whole AC cycle.
 
Just a little tidbit of information... Although reactive power does indeed do no work, it is very important. The blackout of 2003 was caused in part by the lack of reactive power.
 
A nice basic intro to work from, taken from my marine engineering notes:
"
In DC circuits, power is a result of the current and voltage multiplied together. This is acceptable because the current and voltage are in phase with each other. It is acceptable in AC circuits where the load is totally resistive. In reality the load onboard is more inductive (due to motor windings) and resistive (due to heating/lighting etc). In inductive circuits with AC, the constant changing on current and voltage causes a constantly changing magnetic field. This induces and emf into the windings which opposes the source creating it (Lenz'z Law) causing an inductive reactance. Reactance (whether due to inductance or capacitance) and resistance together combine to give impedance.
"

Remember that in AC circuits, a solenoid actually resists the current BUT does not use any power (and therefore do any work) in doing so. SO balancing this relationship of REACTANCE and RESISTANCE gives IMPEDANCE and that is used to form the power factor triangle (you gave the equations in your question). When this goes out of shape, you have blackouts and lots of wasted energy. Back in the good old days (I suppose World War 2 time'ish) industrial works and factories in England used to get a reduction in their electric costs if they could prove they had a good power factor, of say 0.8+.

Hope it helps.
 
Reactive power involves an actual current flow, and hence heating, even though it produces no useful work. Because of this current, and the associated losses, it is is highly undesirable.

Power factor correction, alluded to by XaseR, is still very much practiced today. This is one of the reasons for the popularity of synchronous motors because with the proper excitation they can look like a capacitor on the line, thus offsetting inductive loads. Utility companies do not like customers with very bad power factors, and they will charge extra for such service.
 
Some more description, which was almost said above: reactive power is the energy flow used in the creation and collapse of magnetic (inductors) and electric fields (capacitors) in the system. The energy could be desribed as sloshing back and forth as the fields build and fall, though this does not work. The sloshing still creates current flow, and thus greater requirements for on the electrical transmission system (conductor sizes, etc).

The 'theta' in the OP is defined as the phase angle between the oscillating current i(t) and voltage v(t)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K