What Do E, V, and e Mean in Voltage Symbols?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Line
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
13 replies · 5K views
Line
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
Throughout EE I've seen many symbols. When it comes to voltage I've seen E,V,and e. Do they all mean the same thing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
E is generally used for electric field

V or v is generally used for voltage

e generally refers to an electron or the constant from natural logs
 
In the book I've been readinf E means potential difference.

And e was in one about Industion. Eqaution looked something like
L=de/dt
 
Sounds like your book has problems. What are the title and author of the book? Potential difference is voltage V, and [tex]E = - \nabla V[/tex]
 
E can be used for electromotive force which is equivalent to voltage right?
 
Last edited:
berkeman said:
Sounds like your book has problems. What are the title and author of the book? Potential difference is voltage V, and [tex]E = - \nabla V[/tex]

If you're counting V is the actual voltage and Eis the voltage with ground
calculated then [tex]E=V- \nabla V[/tex] ...potential difference.
 
Last edited:
Here we use U for the voltage and sometimes E for the EMK.
We use V to symbolize the potential difference.
e should be the time dependent voltage (of course we use u for that).
 
Line said:
If you're counting V is the actual voltage and Eis the voltage with ground
calculated then [tex]E=V- \nabla V[/tex] ...potential difference.
Holy smokes, that's totally wrong and misleading. Try putting units into that equation...
 
berkeman said:
Holy smokes, that's totally wrong and misleading. Try putting units into that equation...
Potential DIfference does eqaul voltage minus the change in voltage doesn't it?

IN my boo E was potential difference, V was voltage and e had to do with induction.

e=N x d(webers)/dt
 
Line said:
Potential DIfference does eqaul voltage minus the change in voltage doesn't it?
It can, but that's not what you wrote. There's a big difference between [tex]\nabla[/tex] and [tex]\Delta[/tex] :smile:

FYI, [tex]\Delta[/tex] can represent a change (as I guess you intended), but [tex]\nabla[/tex] is the gradient operator. So the equation [tex]E = -\nabla V[/tex] is the way that we usually show the relationship between the vector electric field E and the scalar potential V.
 
Last edited:
In the beginning of the book they teach us E as the voltage.

I=E/R

Then in the middle they give us V.

P=VV/R
 
Valhalla said:
E can be used for electromotive force which is equivalent to voltage right?
You are correct, E can be used for http://www.phys.uAlberta.ca/~gingrich/phys395/notes/node8.html .

As Berkeman has also mentioned, E (especially boldface) is also used in electrical engineering for "electric field", so be careful of the context in which you are using these symbols.

Line said:
In the beginning of the book they teach us E as the voltage.

I=E/R

Then in the middle they give us V.

P=VV/R
So in your book, they are using E interchangably with V for voltage potential. (they are virtually synonymous).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds to me you have a terrible book, Line.