What Do Hard and Soft Spectrums Really Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
AI Thread Summary
The terms "hard" and "soft" in spectra refer to the energy levels and frequencies of the emitted radiation. Hard gamma rays possess higher energy, frequency, and shorter wavelengths compared to soft gamma rays. In the context of neutron star atmospheres, a "harder" spectrum indicates a shift towards higher energy emissions compared to blackbody spectra. This shift suggests that the flux in light element atmospheres exceeds that of blackbody radiation. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for interpreting astrophysical phenomena.
nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7
"Hard" Spectrum

What exactly is meant when a spectrum is said to be "hard" or "soft", or "harder"/"softer" compared to a different spectrum?


Cheers,
Nick
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Hard gamma rays, for example, have higher energy, higher frequency, and shorter wavelength than soft gamma rays.
 


Thanks George Jones. I'm not entirely sure if that answers my question though.

For example consider the following from "Model neutron star atmospheres with low magnetic fields" Zavlin, Pavlov, Shibanov 1996. Astron. Astrophys 315, 141-152. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9604072

In the abstract they write "... We show that the model atmosphere spectra are substantially different from the black-body spectra. For light element atmospheres, the flux is greater than the blackbody flux, and the spectrum is harder..."

What is the meaning of harder in this context?
 


From the paper
The maxima of the spectra ... , i.e., they are shifted by a factor of 1.6 - 1.8 from the corresponding blackbody maxima towards higher energies.
 


Ah... thank you very much.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top