What do positrons have to do with dark matter?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DiracPool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between positrons and dark matter, particularly in light of findings from the AMS experiment aboard the ISS. The excess of positrons detected is hypothesized to result from dark matter particle annihilation events, suggesting a local source of dark matter within the Milky Way. While the presence of these positrons hints at dark matter interactions, it remains uncertain whether they originate from dark matter or other sources like pulsars. The conversation references various theories, including the WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) model and the potential existence of dark photons, indicating the complexity of understanding dark matter's nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the AMS (Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer) experiment
  • Familiarity with dark matter theories, specifically WIMP models
  • Knowledge of particle physics, particularly annihilation events
  • Basic concepts of cosmic ray interactions and sources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the AMS experiment findings and their implications for dark matter detection
  • Study the WIMP model and its variations, including self-annihilation hypotheses
  • Explore the role of pulsars in cosmic ray production and their relation to positrons
  • Investigate the concept of dark photons and their potential impact on dark matter theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in dark matter, particle physics, and cosmic ray studies will benefit from this discussion.

DiracPool
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
514
In referring to the recent results of the AMS experiment in the ISS:

http://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/40

I'm still left wanting of understanding why the presence of an excess of positrons infiltrating the device isometrically indicates a presence of dark matter and tells me something about it.

What I'm getting is that this positron excess is supposed to be reflective of annihilation events in the dark matter. From the article:

But a more exciting possibility is that the positrons come from the annihilation of dark matter particles, which may populate the Milky Way and its halo [6]. Dark matter is, after all, a dominant form of the matter-energy budget of the Universe, but we don’t know its particle nature or how it interacts with itself and with normal matter (other than through gravitational interactions

But if we don't know what dark matter is, how can we say that annihilation events would produce excess positrons, or positrons at all? I don't know if I'm feeling my 2 billions dollars working for me here. Can someone enlighten me?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The energy believed necessary for dark particle annihilation suggests positrons must be created. The excess of positrons detected suggests particle creation events that cannot be accounted for by processes within our galaxy. It is possible they could be from extragalactic sources, but, positrons probably cannot survive the vast distances involved. That suggests a local source of unseen matter must be involved [i.e., dark matter].
 
Last edited:
No one claims they’ve detected dark matter because of the tiny excess of positrons detected. All they can say is that if one particular version of the WIMP (self-annihilation) hypothesis is true then they would expect some positrons. They correctly remind us these positrons may come from somewhere else, for instance, Pulsars. The WIMP models have several epicycles: Check out Neil Weiner of NYU who postulated some excess positrons from the PAMELA experiment were due to WIMP collisions. Later, Lisa Randall of Harvard added this new twist: there may be two types of WIMPS and only some small fraction of them would interact with each other via a new “dark force”. Not very likely, in my opinion, because this WIMP self-interacting epicycle would require a new complication: the “dark photon”.
http://www.newscientist.com/article...tale-hints-at-shadow-milky-way.html?full=true
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K