What do u need to learn topology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter michealsmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
AI Thread Summary
To learn topology, a foundational understanding of basic set theory and algebra is essential. Familiarity with analysis can significantly enhance comprehension of topological concepts. A topology on a set X consists of subsets that meet specific axioms, such as including X and the empty set, and allowing for arbitrary unions and finite intersections. Examples of topologies include the trivial topology and the cofinite topology. Overall, while additional knowledge may be beneficial, a solid grasp of set theory and algebra is sufficient to begin studying topology.
michealsmith
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
wat do u need to learn topology?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
time.... :-))
 
Familiarity with analysis, and some algebra would help too...
 
what do you need to learn anything?

in this case you need to be not scared when I say the following:

If X is a set, then a topology on X is a collection of subsets T in P(X) (the power set) satisfying the following axioms:

X is in T, the empty set is in T, the union of arbitrarily many elements of T is an element of T, and the finite intersection of elements of T is an element of T.

That is exactly what a topology of open sets on X is. Examples: the trivial topology: T is the empty set and X alone

The cofinite topology, T contains the empty set, X and precisely those subsets of X whose complements are finite.

If X is a metric space then the open sets in the metric are a topology.

If any or all of that is too daunting then learn some more set theory and analysis
 
Last edited:
michealsmith said:
wat do u need to learn topology?

Basic set theory and algebra -- that's about it. Depending on how the course is taught, other stuff will definitely be handy, but not actually essential. That said, a lot of topology will make more sense if you have exposure to concepts from analysis.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
623
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
549
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top