What Do Wave Crests in Electromagnetic Radiation Represent?

AI Thread Summary
Wave crests in electromagnetic radiation represent the maximum electric and magnetic forces experienced by a charge at a given moment. The energy for radiation arises from electrons transitioning between energy levels, specifically when they drop to a lower shell. The frequency of a wave, such as 2.4×10^23 Hz, does not correspond to the electron's orbit but rather to the energy change during these transitions. The traditional view of electrons orbiting the nucleus is outdated; a more accurate representation is that electrons resonate in a spherical pattern around the nucleus. Overall, understanding wave crests involves recognizing their role in amplitude rather than literal electron orbits.
land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
On Wikipedia and in the textbooks, it is very general and it does not explain so, curious,
for the different wavelengths of radiation, (or light) what do the wave crests actually correspond to?
Do they correspond to the electron making a complete orbit around the nucleus, or to something else?
For instance, a particular type of wave is at a frequency of about 2.4×1023 Hz
is that how frequent the electron orbits around the nucleus and makes 1 rotation around it ?
Or is that because the electron is going from a higher to lower shell?
 
Science news on Phys.org
land_of_ice said:
Or is that because the electron is going from a higher to lower shell?

Yes.
 
The dropping of the electron into the lower shell is where the energy for the radiation is coming from. But the crests are representing the amplitude of the wave. Since this is electromagnetic radiation, the crests correspond to the maximum electric and magnetic forces that would be felt by a charge if one were there at that particular moment in time.

And, you really shouldn't have the idea of the electrons as literally orbiting the nucleus. That is the old Bohr model. I like to think more of the electron as kind of resonating in a circular (read: spherical) pattern around the nucleus, somewhat like a bell. All of these pictures are inaccurate, but -- for me -- this idea is less so.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top