What do you think about these two textbooks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbooks
AI Thread Summary
"Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai are recognized as challenging yet essential texts for graduate studies in physics. Jackson's book is praised for its depth in mathematical techniques for solving electromagnetic problems, though it requires significant effort to master. Sakurai, while modern and rigorous, may not be suitable as a first quantum mechanics text due to its complexity and less organized presentation. Many recommend starting with more foundational texts before tackling Sakurai. Overall, both books are considered valuable resources that every physicist should own despite their difficulties.
Wong
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

What do you think about "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai? I heard some people say both of them are quite difficult/abstract. I would like to see if it is a good idea to buy them both for my courses.

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jackson has been the standard text for Graduate Electromagnetics/Dynamics for nearly 40 years. It takes a bunch of work to feel comfortable with the material in it, i.e. you have to do most of the problems and rework most of the theory in the text in detail.

As for Sakurai, I took many courses in Qantum Mechanics and still have difficulty doing all of the problems. It is a more modern text as opposed to Messiah or Mertzbacher and maybe that is my problem, I never learned to work with bra-ket notaion comfortably.


The more you study them, the more you will learn. Both are useful texts to have around, just as Goldstein is for Mechanics.

DT
 
Jackson teaches you the mathematical techniques for solving EM problems, and is good at that.

I would not recommend Sakurai as a first Q.Mech text - start off with Cohen-Tannoudji or the like, and if you want harder problems, look at Sakurai.
 
Wong said:
Hi all,

What do you think about "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai? I heard some people say both of them are quite difficult/abstract. I would like to see if it is a good idea to buy them both for my courses.

Thanks a lot.
By both of them, as far as I believe not know, they are all good textbooks, this is what i have just asked several people here,

but first of all, you need to TAKE ALL THE BASICS ABOUT THOSE, TAKE THEM ALL,
so you have to take a look at YOUR LIBRARY again.

and TRY TO SEARCH AND ASK THEM TO DELIVER MUCH MORE MUCH MORE RELATED SOURCES.
I also learn LOTS from those SOURCES, true!

Stop thinking about other subjects you know, and you have to concentrate on THOSE SOURCES.

All in all, both of the books above are good. But again, DELIVERY MUST be much more.
Understand ?
 
Thanks for all the replies.

At last, I bought both of them, because there is only one copy of each in the library and so I cannot "borrow them through" the whole semester. In fact I think they are quite expensive, considering that I may get a good hardcover (with nice pics) on other subjects with the same money I spent.

I read the first chapter of Sakurai briefly. I do not quite like his style of presentation. The derivations are rigorous, but the materials are not as clearly presented and "well-organised" as in a mathematical text. But I still think it is delightful as a textbook.
 
They are both bibles of the graduate study. Every physicist should have one copy of these books.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Back
Top