What does a magnetic moment of an atom mean?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of magnetic moments of atoms, specifically focusing on the magnetic moment of iron and the challenges in finding standardized values. Participants explore the use of these values in computational tools like VASP and the importance of reliable references.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes discrepancies in reported magnetic moments for iron, citing values from different sources, including Web Elements and another unspecified reference.
  • Another participant suggests that 2.2 bohr magnetons is a widely accepted value for the atomic magnetic moment of iron, referencing a specific webpage for verification.
  • A later reply mentions that the nuclear magnetic moment is approximately 0.09 bohr, indicating a distinction between atomic and nuclear magnetic moments.
  • Participants discuss the importance of context when selecting references, emphasizing that the precision required may vary based on the application, such as proof-of-concept versus cutting-edge research.
  • One participant highlights the necessity of understanding the surrounding text in references to grasp what is being measured and the potential error estimates associated with those measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate values for magnetic moments, with no consensus on a single "official" table of magnetic moments. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best sources for these values.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the definitions of magnetic moments being referenced and the potential variability in reported values based on different measurement contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and students working in fields related to magnetism, computational materials science, or those needing accurate magnetic moment values for theoretical or experimental work.

schrodingerscat11
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
I am using VASP and it recommended to use the experimental magnetic moment for MAGMOM tag. The problem is I can't find a standard table of magnetic moments. I see different values from different sources. E.g In Web Elements, the magnetic moment of Fe is 0.096 μ/μN. But in another source, it is 2.22 μN per atom. Is there an "official" table of magnetic moments in standard units (whatever that unit may be)? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
2.2 bohr magnetons seems about right for the atomic magnetic moment of atomic Iron... I have not found a source disagreeing with that.

I found this:
http://www.webelements.com/iron/
... that what you saw?

About half way down the page, under the heading "iron isotopes" there is a table of properties, listing the value you quoted under the column "nuclear magnetic moment".
0.09 bohr seems about right for the nuclear magnetic moment.

I cannot check the other reference because you did not cite it.

What counts as a good reference depends on what you want the information for.
A standard desk reference is usually good enough for proof-of-concept type stuff, i.e. the Web Elements page used:
Mills, I. et al. Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, 1988.

Bleeding edge development may be sensitive to the precision of numbers so it should either be measured in-house or the best recent measurement from the literature for your field should be used.

Standard accepted values can usually be found published by the national standards body for your jurisdiction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schrodingerscat11
Thanks! I found an example and they used the one in Bohr magnetons, (2.22). The source is Kittel's book.. :)
 
Well done.
In general, when looking up standard references, you have to be sure to read the surrounding text carefully - that will explain what, exactly, is being measured and, sometimes, how. People get caught out all the time. A good source should also have an error estimate with measurements.
 
Thanks! I will follow your advice. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K