What Does a Muddy Precipitate Indicate in a Redox Reaction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting the formation of a muddy precipitate in a redox reaction involving an orange solution of substance 'A' and an unpleasant-smelling gas. The solid formed indicates a possible reduction of either dichromate (Cr2O7)2- or ferric ion (Fe3+), both of which can lead to a green solution upon warming with concentrated HCl. The gas introduced is likely a reducing agent, with potential candidates including NH3, SO2, NO2, H2S, or Cl2. The participant expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their deductions and seeks further clarification on the implications of the observations. Overall, the muddy precipitate suggests a complex interaction between the gas and the solution, warranting further experimental investigation.
AikiGirl
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"State what you would infer from each of the following observations and suggest experiments you would carry out to test the validity of your inferences: When an unpleasant smelling gas was bubbled into an orange solution of a substance 'A', a solid was formed and the mixture appeared muddy in colour. On warming with conc HCl, some of the solid dissolved and the solution appeared green in colour."


Homework Equations


This is what I came up with:
Possible gases: NH3, SO2, NO2, H2S, Cl2
Possible solns: Br2, (Cr2O7)2-, Fe3+


The Attempt at a Solution



The soln is either (Cr2O7)2- or Fe3+ because they both are reduced to a green soln.

So the gas should be oxidised.

NH3: (NH4)- (same oxidation state)
SO2: (SO3)2- (same oxidation state), (SO4)2- (no ppt),
NO2: (NO3)- (same oxidation state),
H2S: S (yellow ppt), SO2 (gas), (SO3)2-, (SO4)2- (no ppt),
Cl2: Cl- (mostly soluble)

That's what I can figure out, not sure if it's correct, and not sure where to go from here. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AikiGirl said:
The soln is either (Cr2O7)2- or Fe3+ because they both are reduced to a green soln.

So the gas is a reducing one.

Note: gas can reduce the substance in solution, but the precipitate doesn't have to contain reduced form of the gas - it can as well contain gas in the form introduced (protonated/neutralized depending on circumstances).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top