What does an accelerometer measure?

Click For Summary
An accelerometer measures proper acceleration, which is the acceleration felt by an object, rather than coordinate acceleration, which can vary based on the observer's frame of reference. When a phone lies flat on a table, it registers around 9.81 m/s² in the z direction due to Earth's gravity, while showing zero in the x and y directions. In free fall, the accelerometer reads zero because the phone experiences weightlessness, illustrating that it does not feel any proper acceleration. This distinction is crucial in understanding how accelerometers function, especially in the context of relativity, where coordinate acceleration is considered a convention rather than a direct observable. Overall, an accelerometer provides a consistent measure of the acceleration that an object experiences directly.
greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi

I'm confused about what an accelerometer actually measures. I downloaded an app that reads out the data of the accelerometer in my phone in all three dimensions. If I lay it flat on a table, it says something around 9.81 in the z direction and something around zero in the x and y directions. If I drop it (and record the data), the acceleration is about zero in all three directions.

This somehow makes sense since one feels weightless when in free fall. But still, the phone is only accelerated in the second case, and shouldn't an accelerometer measure acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
I'm confused about what an accelerometer actually measures.

An accelerometer measures proper acceleration; that is, the acceleration actually felt by an object. This can be thought of as the weight the object feels, divided by its (assumed constant) mass.

greypilgrim said:
This somehow makes sense since one feels weightless when in free fall.

Exactly. And, conversely, one does feel weight when standing at rest on the surface of the Earth (or lying on a table). That's why an accelerometer gives a nonzero reading in the latter case, but not the former.

greypilgrim said:
he phone is only accelerated in the second case

This is a different kind of acceleration, called "coordinate acceleration", and your experiment is a nice illustration of why the term "proper acceleration" was invented: you can't always feel coordinate acceleration, so we need a separate term to describe the kind of acceleration you can always feel, and which an accelerometer measures.

In relativity, in fact, coordinate acceleration is considered to be a convention, something you can change just by choosing different coordinates, not a direct observable. For example, when you drop your phone, it has coordinate acceleration with respect to (non-inertial) coordinates in which you, standing on the floor, are at rest; but it does not have coordinate acceleration with respect to (inertial) coordinates in which the phone is at rest. But it has zero proper acceleration regardless of which coordinates you pick--you can't change the accelerometer reading just by choosing different coordinates.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K