Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This is not a homework question but a clarification on the following proof:

Suppose [itex]h[/itex] is an infinitely differentiable real-valued function defined on [itex]/Re[/itex] such that [itex]h(1/n)=0[/itex] for all [itex] n \in N [/itex]. Then prove [itex]h^{(k)}(0)=0[/itex] for all [itex] k \in [/itex].

Proof: Since h is infinitely differentiable in a neighborhood of 0, the kth derivative of h at 0 is the limit of its normalized (k+1)th divided difference at distinct nodes [itex]x_1,x_2,...,x_{k+1}[/itex] as they tend to 0: [tex] h^{(k)}(0)=k! \lim_{x_1,x_2,...,x_{k+1} \rightarrow 0 } \nabla (x_1,...,x_{k+1})h [/tex]

Now, choosing [itex] x_j := x_j(n) = \frac{1}{(n+j)}[/itex] and letting [itex] n \in \aleph [/itex] tend to infinity, we see that [itex] h^{k}(0) = 0 [/itex] for all [itex] k \in N [/itex].

I don't understand the proof above since I don't know what normalized (k+1)th divided difference at distinct nodes means. Does anyone know?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What does normalized (k + 1)th divided difference at distinct nodes mean?

Loading...

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**