What does normalized (k + 1)th divided difference at distinct nodes mean?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CantorSet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Mean Nodes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concept of normalized (k + 1)th divided difference at distinct nodes in the context of infinitely differentiable functions. Specifically, it addresses the proof that if h is an infinitely differentiable function such that h(1/n) = 0 for all n in natural numbers, then the k-th derivative h^{(k)}(0) equals zero for all k in natural numbers. The proof utilizes the limit of the normalized divided difference as the nodes approach zero, demonstrating that h^{(k)}(0) = 0 through induction and Rolle's theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinitely differentiable functions
  • Familiarity with divided differences and their applications
  • Knowledge of limits and their properties in calculus
  • Basic concepts of mathematical induction and Rolle's theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of divided differences in numerical analysis
  • Learn about the implications of Rolle's theorem in calculus
  • Explore the concept of limits in the context of calculus
  • Investigate the applications of induction in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in advanced topics related to derivatives and their proofs will benefit from this discussion.

CantorSet
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

This is not a homework question but a clarification on the following proof:

Suppose h is an infinitely differentiable real-valued function defined on /Re such that h(1/n)=0 for all n \in N. Then prove h^{(k)}(0)=0 for all k \in.

Proof: Since h is infinitely differentiable in a neighborhood of 0, the kth derivative of h at 0 is the limit of its normalized (k+1)th divided difference at distinct nodes x_1,x_2,...,x_{k+1} as they tend to 0: h^{(k)}(0)=k! \lim_{x_1,x_2,...,x_{k+1} \rightarrow 0 } \nabla (x_1,...,x_{k+1})h

Now, choosing x_j := x_j(n) = \frac{1}{(n+j)} and letting n \in \aleph tend to infinity, we see that h^{k}(0) = 0 for all k \in N.

I don't understand the proof above since I don't know what normalized (k+1)th divided difference at distinct nodes means. Does anyone know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To rephrase the proof, we are using induction on k and Rolle's theorem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K