What Does <S> Mean in Spin Measurement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lonewolf219
  • Start date Start date
lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2
I am reading about spin, and I think <S_{x}> represents the measured value of spin along the x component. The same would follow for <S_{y}> and <S_{z}>. I also think I read that we can't measure all three values during an experiment. Once we measure one component, we can't measure the other two. So then I don't really understand what <S> means because it cannot be the total measured spin, since we can only know one component.

Does <S> mean the expectation value of each component?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
&lt;S&gt; is the expectation value for the total spin.The point that it can't be known exactly doesn't mean it is not defined at all.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
lonewolf219 said:
I
Does <S> mean the expectation value of each component?

No, it's the expectation value of the magnitude of the total spin vector, that is, the expectation value of ##\sqrt{S_x^2+S_y^2+S_z^2}##. It is somewhat counterintuitive, but we can know the magnitude of the vector as well as the value of anyone of its three components.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
:smile: I'm glad I asked... thanks Shyan and Nugatory!
 
lonewolf219 said:
So then I don't really understand what <S> means because it cannot be the total measured spin, since we can only know one component.

As noted above, it's the expectation value of the magnitude of the spin (intrinsic angular momentum) vector. For a fundamental particle this is in fact fixed for each particle: ##\langle S \rangle = S = \sqrt{s(s+1)} \hbar## where ##s## is the spin quantum number for that particle.

For an electron, ##s = 1/2## so ##\langle S \rangle = S = (\sqrt{3}/2) \hbar##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jtbell, thanks for posting... that is exactly what I have just been putting together, and your post confirms it. I appreciate it!
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Back
Top