What Does the Encircled Equation Mean?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the encircled equation representing the equilibrium of forces in a physics problem involving concurrent forces. The equation indicates that the horizontal and vertical components of the resultant force, $\mathbf F_R$, are both zero, leading to the conclusion that the forces balance each other out. Participants clarify that the components of the forces, $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$, are independent and equate to zero due to the cancellation of equal and opposite forces, resulting in a net force of $\mathbf F_R = \mathbf 0$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector components in physics
  • Familiarity with equilibrium conditions in mechanics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Basic grasp of force diagrams and free-body diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Learn about free-body diagrams and their applications in solving force problems
  • Explore vector addition and resolution of forces in two dimensions
  • Investigate the role of trigonometric functions in resolving forces
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding force equilibrium and vector analysis in physical systems.

Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
Hello! :)

I just want to ask how, did the encircled portion come about?

It says that it equates the $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$ components.

but when I tried that, this is what I get

$0.5447F_{1}=F_{3}(\sin(\theta)-\cos(\theta))$ ---> This expression doesn't ring a bell. It doesn't make any sense to me.
 

Attachments

  • mechanicsCHII-46.jpg
    mechanicsCHII-46.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 76
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Drain Brain said:
Hello! :)

I just want to ask how, did the encircled portion come about?

It says that it equates the $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$ components.

but when I tried that, this is what I get

$0.5447F_{1}=F_{3}(\sin(\theta)-\cos(\theta))$ ---> This expression doesn't ring a bell. It doesn't make any sense to me.

Hi Drain Brain,

The $\mathbf F_R$ on the left hand side is really:
$$\mathbf F_R = 0\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\imath} + 0 \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$$
Since the $\boldsymbol{\hat\imath}$ component is completely independent from the $\boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$, we match them left and right.

Put otherwise, we separate the equation in:
- Sum of the horizontal forces is zero
- Sum of the vertical forces is zero
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Drain Brain,

The $\mathbf F_R$ on the left hand side is really:
$$\mathbf F_R = 0\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\imath} + 0 \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$$
Since the $\boldsymbol{\hat\imath}$ component is completely independent from the $\boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$, we match them left and right.

Put otherwise, we separate the equation in:
- Sum of the horizontal forces is zero
- Sum of the vertical forces is zero

Hi, I Like Serena!

Can you tell me why the i and j components become 0?

What I'm thinking about the problem is that the components of $F_{R}$ are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction that's why they cancel each other and produce a resultant of 0. Is my line of thinking correct? If not please explain to me why the components became both 0. Thanks!
 
Drain Brain said:
Hi, I Like Serena!

Can you tell me why the i and j components become 0?

What I'm thinking about the problem is that the components of $F_{R}$ are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction that's why they cancel each other and produce a resultant of 0. Is my line of thinking correct? If not please explain to me why the components became both 0. Thanks!

It's because the problem statement says:

The three concurrent forces acting on the screw eye produce a resultant force of $\mathbf F_R = \mathbf 0$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
909
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K