MHB What Does the Encircled Equation Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
Hello! :)

I just want to ask how, did the encircled portion come about?

It says that it equates the $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$ components.

but when I tried that, this is what I get

$0.5447F_{1}=F_{3}(\sin(\theta)-\cos(\theta))$ ---> This expression doesn't ring a bell. It doesn't make any sense to me.
 

Attachments

  • mechanicsCHII-46.jpg
    mechanicsCHII-46.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 67
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Drain Brain said:
Hello! :)

I just want to ask how, did the encircled portion come about?

It says that it equates the $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$ components.

but when I tried that, this is what I get

$0.5447F_{1}=F_{3}(\sin(\theta)-\cos(\theta))$ ---> This expression doesn't ring a bell. It doesn't make any sense to me.

Hi Drain Brain,

The $\mathbf F_R$ on the left hand side is really:
$$\mathbf F_R = 0\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\imath} + 0 \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$$
Since the $\boldsymbol{\hat\imath}$ component is completely independent from the $\boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$, we match them left and right.

Put otherwise, we separate the equation in:
- Sum of the horizontal forces is zero
- Sum of the vertical forces is zero
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Drain Brain,

The $\mathbf F_R$ on the left hand side is really:
$$\mathbf F_R = 0\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\imath} + 0 \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$$
Since the $\boldsymbol{\hat\imath}$ component is completely independent from the $\boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$, we match them left and right.

Put otherwise, we separate the equation in:
- Sum of the horizontal forces is zero
- Sum of the vertical forces is zero

Hi, I Like Serena!

Can you tell me why the i and j components become 0?

What I'm thinking about the problem is that the components of $F_{R}$ are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction that's why they cancel each other and produce a resultant of 0. Is my line of thinking correct? If not please explain to me why the components became both 0. Thanks!
 
Drain Brain said:
Hi, I Like Serena!

Can you tell me why the i and j components become 0?

What I'm thinking about the problem is that the components of $F_{R}$ are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction that's why they cancel each other and produce a resultant of 0. Is my line of thinking correct? If not please explain to me why the components became both 0. Thanks!

It's because the problem statement says:

The three concurrent forces acting on the screw eye produce a resultant force of $\mathbf F_R = \mathbf 0$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top