B What does the scalar product of two displacements represent?

AI Thread Summary
The scalar product of two displacement vectors results in a value measured in square meters, which can be interpreted as an abstract area related to the lengths of the vectors and their projection. This area does not represent a tangible geometric figure that can be drawn directly on a diagram of the vectors. It is noted that the area is signed, meaning it can be negative if the angle between the vectors exceeds 90 degrees. Additionally, the discussion touches on the cross product, which relates to the volume of a parallelepiped formed by three vectors. Overall, the scalar product's area is more of a mathematical concept than a physical representation.
andylatham82
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
The scalar product of two displacements gives a displacement squared (area). What does this represent?
Hi,

This feels like such a stupid question, but it's bugging me. Two displacements can be represented with two vectors. Let's say their magnitudes are expressed in metres. The scalar (dot) product of the two vectors results in a value with the units of square metres, which must be an area. Can anyone tell me what this area is in relation to the two vectors?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andylatham82 said:
Summary:: The scalar product of two displacements gives a displacement squared (area). What does this represent?
Two displacements can be represented with two vectors. Let's say their magnitudes are expressed in metres. The scalar (dot) product of the two vectors results in a value with the units of square metres, which must be an area. Can anyone tell me what this area is in relation to the two vectors?
From my undergrad alma mater... :smile:

https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~dadde...plications/Determinant/Determinant/node4.html

1581464307482.png
 
andylatham82 said:
Can anyone tell me what this area is in relation to the two vectors?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_product#Geometric_definition

You can interpret this as the area of a rectangle, with the sides:
- length of vector1
- length of vector2 projection onto vector1

But note that this is a signed area, which goes negative if the angle is > 90°.
 
A.T. said:
This seems to be about the cross product.
Dagnabit! I blame Google, and my alma mater, of course. o0)

Thanks! :smile:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes sophiecentaur and anorlunda
A.T. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_product#Geometric_definition

You can interpret this as the area of a rectangle, with the sides:
- length of vector1
- length of vector2 projection onto vector1

But note that this is a signed area, which goes negative if the angle is > 90°.

Thanks very much for the response. So the resultant area doesn't really represent anything tangible with regards to the two displacements? It's just an abstract 'area' that you couldn't, say, draw on a diagram of the two vectors?
 
berkeman said:
Dagnabit! I blame Google, and my alma mater, of course. o0)

Thanks! :smile:

Thanks for the link anyway, I was also wondering what the cross product would represent, so you've answered that question for me!
 
andylatham82 said:
It's just an abstract 'area' that you couldn't, say, draw on a diagram of the two vectors?
Nothing stops you from drawing that rectangle torgether with the vectors and their projection.
 
andylatham82 said:
Thanks for the link anyway, I was also wondering what the cross product would represent, so you've answered that question for me!
To complete the picture, the scalar product of the cross product with a third vector ##\vec c## is the volume of the parallelepiped defined by the three vectors,$$V=(\vec a \times \vec b)\cdot \vec c=(\vec c \times \vec a)\cdot \vec b=(\vec b \times \vec c)\cdot \vec a.$$Note that the third vector must be in the direction of the cross product to ensure a positive volume. If the three vectors are coplanar, the volume is, obviously, zero.
 
Back
Top