What does the symbol ‹[·]› mean in signal and communication systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter j_penac13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Symbol
AI Thread Summary
The symbol ‹[·]› in signal and communication systems appears to represent an operation similar to a Fourier transform, with the dot indicating a placeholder for the variable being operated on. It is suggested that the dot may denote the input to the operation, akin to how inner products are expressed in mathematical notation. The discussion also touches on the average value of a function, hinting at a connection between these concepts. The exact meaning of the brackets remains unclear, prompting further research. Overall, the symbol's interpretation is linked to common mathematical conventions in signal processing.
j_penac13
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello there! I am in a class of signal and communication systems and found this symbol:
‹[·]› But I can't figure what it means, teacher told us to research it. Been reading books like crazy and can't find anything. Hope you can help me.

I put a picture of how he used it, if that helps you.
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.png
    Picture1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 462
Mathematics news on Phys.org
looks kind of like a Fourier transform of [.]
 
Well, the problem isn't the whole operation, because it is kinda Fourier transform. Thing is what does [.] mean?!
 
Sometimes authors will use a dot to denote where the thing to be operated is supposed to go. For example, the inner product is linear in the first term can be written as:
< . ,u> is linear for any fixed u. Maybe something similar to that? Not sure about the brackets
 
the average value of a function f is usually written as \frac{1}{b-a} \int_{a}^{b}{f(x)dx}

so set a = -T/2 & b = T/2 & then T--> infinity... that's more like it
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top