What does this line of Isaac Newton's rap video mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Mean Video
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a line from Isaac Newton's rap video referencing an unsolved integral he wrote, specifically mentioning the sixty-fourth power of an unknown variable. Neil Degrasse Tyson humorously notes that the answer to the calculation is "i," which refers to the imaginary unit. Historically, while the concept of imaginary numbers existed during Newton's time, he and contemporaries dismissed them as fanciful, leaving some equations unsolved. The integral in question is related to a calculus limerick that echoes Newton's line, emphasizing the mathematical challenge. The inquiry reflects a desire for clarity on the historical context of Newton's struggles with certain equations.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
Go to 1:24 of this video:

He recalls some integral he wrote at a young age:

" ... times the sixty-fourth power of ... what?" and looks confused. At 1:44 Neil Degrasse Tyson says, "By the way, the answer to your little calculation is i."

Can someone explain the historical reference to me? Was there some integral that Sir Isaac Newton could never solve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral sec y dy from zero to one-sixth of pi is log to base e of the square root of three times the sixty-fourth power of what?!

250px-5373455_orig.gif


(While the concept of imaginary numbers and i existed during Newton's time, he and other great thinkers of the time (such as René Descartes, that later solved the equation with "Descartes' i") dismissed the idea of imaginary numbers as fanciful. Thus, despite his best powers of deduction, Newton was stymied by the equation he wrote and thought it unsolvable.)

This also comes from a calculus limerick which reads similar to Newton's line:

"The integral sec y dy (pronounced "seek y dee y'")
From zero to one-sixth of pi
Is log to base e
Of the square root of three
Times the 64th power of
i"

http://epicrapbattlesofhistory.wikia.com/wiki/Sir_Isaac_Newton_vs_Bill_Nye/Rap_Meanings
 
I have the book in which this is written in but I can't find what section
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top