What does this notation mean exactly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demon117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Notation
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
I have been staring at this practically all day. I understand bra-ket notation but this is weird. Possibly a typo?

<f|p, g> = <pf|g>

f and g are functions in Hilbert space and p is the spherical momentum operator. What properties of f and g would make this possible? I guess I just want someone to explain this, and also how do you put this in terms of latex command?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The_Duck said:

That is kinda what I thought, because if you go through some properties you end up with

<f|p, g> = (<f|p)|g> = <f|(p|g>) = <f|pg> = <pf|g> which is a property of self-adjoint operators.

So maybe that is all it means, but what properties of f and g allow this, do they have to be elements of the specific Hilbert space you are working with?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If an operator is self adjoint, then the relation would hold for all elements f and g.
 
matumich26 said:
I have been staring at this practically all day. I understand bra-ket notation but this is weird. Possibly a typo?

<f|p, g> = <pf|g>

f and g are functions in Hilbert space and p is the spherical momentum operator.
Why is there both a | and a comma on the left? It should be \langle f|p|g\rangle or \langle f,pg\rangle
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Back
Top