What does vanishing Ricci tensor signify ?

Genocide
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Are Ricci flat manifolds analogous to flat space-time ? Further for Ricci flat manifolds does the Riemann tensor vanish ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Ricci flat space-time is definitely not the same thing as flat space-time and obviously Ricci flat space-times don't necessarily have identically vanishing Riemann tensors. Just take any non-trivial vacuum space-time as an example.

Intuitively, if you consider a shear-free, twist-free, geodesic congruence with tangent field ##\xi^a## then by Raychaudhuri's equation we have that ##\frac{d\theta}{ds} = \xi^a \nabla_a \theta = -\frac{1}{3}\theta^2## for a Ricci flat space-time, where ##\theta = \nabla_a \xi^a## is the expansion of the congruence. What this means is that if the expansion is initially zero (i.e. locally the congruence is initially neither diverging nor converging from a point), and we are in a Ricci flat space-time, then it will remain zero for all "time". In other words if you imagine a small sphere (or swarm) of freely falling test particles with zero twist and shear and initially the sphere of freely falling particles are neither falling towards each other radially nor moving away from each other radially then it will remain so for all proper time along the worldline of anyone particle in the sphere, if we are in a Ricci flat space-time. Contrast this with what happens when we are not in a Ricci flat space-time and the space-time solves Einstein's equation with the weak energy condition imposed.

Ricci flat space-times do enjoy some nice properties however. For example it is easy to show that the twist ##\omega^a = \epsilon^{abcd}\xi_b \nabla_c \xi_d## of any vector field ##\xi^a## that satisfies killing's equation ##\nabla_{(a}\xi_{b)} = 0## (i.e. ##\xi^a## is a killing field) satisfies ##\nabla_{[a}\omega_{b]} = 0## i.e. there exists some scalar ##\omega## such that ##\omega_a = \nabla_a \omega##. Also, for killing fields we always have that ##\nabla_a\nabla_b\xi_c = R_{abc}{}{}^{d}\xi_d## (also easily shown) hence in vacuum killing fields always satisfy ##\nabla^a\nabla_b \xi_a = \nabla^a \nabla_a \xi_b = 0## and they always satisfy ##\nabla_a \xi^a = 0## from killing's equation, point being that the latter is just the Lorenz gauge condition and the former is just the field equation for the electromagnetic 4-potential in the Lorenz gauge i.e. Maxwell's equations are always satisfied in vacuum by killing fields.

There are tons of other interesting and/or useful properties of Ricci flat space-times of course and you can find a profuse of them (including the ones I mentioned above) in Stephani et al. "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations" which is, to say the least, an incredibly awesome book.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Botttom and Genocide
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top