What does Wavelength have to do with Crustal Structure?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between wavelength and crustal structure, particularly in the context of lithospheric composition and isostasy. Participants explore how different wavelengths affect the lithosphere's ability to support loads and the resulting geological features.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that short wavelengths do not depress the lithosphere, while long wavelengths result in flexure and a depression of the Moho.
  • There is a suggestion that the discussion may relate to P and S waves, but clarity on the specific reading material is sought.
  • One participant notes that the wavelength refers to the load on the lithosphere, while another later clarifies it is the wavelength of the resulting deflection of the plate under a force.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of plate buckling under horizontal compression and its relationship to fold trains in mountain belts.
  • A participant explains that a gravity anomaly's wavelength corresponds to its spatial extent, with larger anomalies indicating longer wavelengths.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the specific implications of wavelength in this context, with references to the need for further reading on lithospheric loading and rebound processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the implications of wavelength in relation to crustal structure, with no consensus reached on the specific definitions or applications of these concepts. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of wavelength and its effects.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve unresolved assumptions about the definitions of wavelength and its application to different geological processes, such as lithospheric loading versus horizontal stress. The conversation also touches on the historical context of crustal rebound following ice ages.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63
Forgive my ignorance, I am learning about topics like the geoid, geoid anomalies, gravity anomalies as it relates to lithospheric composition.

In my studies, I repeatedly find talk of show wavelengths and long wavelengths having different effects on crustal composition.

One example I can give that is at the focal point:

Lithosphere can support short wavelength, but cannot support high wave length.
What does this mean?Short wavelengths do not depress the lithosphere, long wavelengths result in flexure and a depression of the Moho.

I guess, my question is why are we talking of wavelengths here?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Are you reading about P and S waves? What exactly are you reading? ...it helps us to help you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
jim mcnamara said:
Are you reading about P and S waves? What exactly are you reading? ...it helps us to help you.

I suspect this is along the lines of what he/she is talking about ?

Dynamics of crustal compensation and its influences on crustal isostasy
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/97JB00956/full#references

Geodynamics Turcotte Schubert - geosci.uchicago.edu
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~kite/doc/Geodynamics_Turcotte_Schubert_part_of_ch_5.pdf

upload_2017-5-30_19-14-24.png
there's a number of other articles, some behind paywalls

this is not a subject that I am well versed in

@jim mcnamara ... are you able to expand on this subject ? as in what the wavelength is that they are talking about ? ... it's been 25yrs since I last studied about isostasy and lithospheric rebound etcDave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Yes, that is a paragraph directly from the text that I am reading (chapter 5 of Geodynamics). I will check out the article you presented.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
johnbbahm said:
I am not sure if I know what your are asking, but some crystals are wavelength sensitive,
Acousto-Optic Modulators work on the idea that at Braggs angle, the acoustic waves in a crystal
can change the path of a beam of light.
https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/milst...sites/48/2016/06/acousto-optics-modulator.pdf
No, I misread his title as "crystal" as well. He is talking about the Earth's crust... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
berkeman said:
No, I misread his title as "crystal" as well. He is talking about the Earth's crust... :smile:
That's funny, I completely misread that!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator and berkeman
I will give this one more try after reading your question again.
In dense structures many of the optical wave equations apply, except C (the speed of light) becomes the speed of sound in that medium.
different types of rock and soil reflect and refract differently like different optical indexes.
I am not sure what would support a shorter wavelength over a longer one though, because generally
the Earth has a fairly severe high frequency cutoff at about 110 hz
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
johnbbahm said:
I will give this one more try after reading your question again.
In dense structures many of the optical wave equations apply, except C (the speed of light) becomes the speed of sound in that medium.
different types of rock and soil reflect and refract differently like different optical indexes.
I am not sure what would support a shorter wavelength over a longer one though, because generally
the Earth has a fairly severe high frequency cutoff at about 110 hz

Please have a read of my links to get an understanding of what the OP is talking about
The subject is about lithospheric loading not reflection/refraction of say seismic ( sound) waves in the crust etcDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator and berkeman
  • #10
@davenn - I learned about this a long time ago as well. One look at the resources tells me to shut up and read.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator and davenn
  • #11
Hi guys, sorry to get back to this thread so late.

I've learned that hte wavelength is describing the load on the lithosphere. I believe it is the wavelength of the load, but I should have a more concrete analysis when I read chapter 3 in Geodynamics by Turbcotte (sp?).
 
  • #12
Okay, so I made a mistake in my above post. It is not the wavelength of the load, but rather the wavelength of the resulting deflection of the plate under a force.

From chapter 3, second 11 of Geodynamics mentioned above:

"When an elastic plate is subjected to a horizontale force P, the plate can buckle if the applied force is sufficiently large. Fold trains in mountain belts are believed to result from the warping of strata under horizontal compression. We therefore consider the simplest example of plate buckling under horizontal compression to determine the minimum force required for buckling to occur and the form, that is, the wavelength, of the resulting deflection. "
 
  • #13
RJLiberator said:
Okay, so I made a mistake in my above post. It is not the wavelength of the load, but rather the wavelength of the resulting deflection of the plate under a force.

From chapter 3, second 11 of Geodynamics mentioned above:

"When an elastic plate is subjected to a horizontale force P, the plate can buckle if the applied force is sufficiently large. Fold trains in mountain belts are believed to result from the warping of strata under horizontal compression. We therefore consider the simplest example of plate buckling under horizontal compression to determine the minimum force required for buckling to occur and the form, that is, the wavelength, of the resulting deflection. "

but that is a totally different process to what you and I have originally discussed
I'm sure you will find lithospheric loading is a vertical load ... ie. from whatever is sitting on top of it. Not horizontal pressure/stress.
This process is one of the things studied when looking at continental ice sheets and how the crust and lithosphere rebound when the ice starts melting
( after a ice age)

I vaguely remember being taught that the North American Plate, particularly nthrn USA and Canada, the rebound is still occurring
so long after the ice age.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-glacial_rebound

http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/sea-level-rise-2/recovering-from-an-ice-age/

http://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/eens1110/glaciers.htmtho these still don't answer your original Q on "What is wavelength in this context"
it is more info on the general subject

@Astronuc are you able to help out here please ?

Dave
 
  • #14
The wavelength is simply the spatial extent of the gravity anomaly. A gravity anomaly that spreads over a large area has a large wavelength. If the lithosphere were infinitely strong then a load would not cause a local depression (and hence a localised "short wavelength" gravity anomaly) but the lithosphere would bear the weight of the load over its entire extent (effectively creating a super "long wavelength" anomaly). Because the lithosphere, in reality, has a finite strength (characterised by its elastic thickness) it buckles locally under a load and cannot sustain a long-wavelength anomaly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and RJLiberator
  • #15
Thanks @billiards - is there a source with more detail on this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billiards
  • #17
Question removed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K