What Drives the Quest for Quantum Gravity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between relativity and quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of gravity and electromagnetism. Participants explore the implications of these differences for the quest for a theory of quantum gravity, examining both theoretical frameworks and the nature of gravitational waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the differences between relativity and quantum mechanics stem from the fundamental distinctions between gravity and electromagnetism.
  • One participant presents the geodesic deviation equations for gravity and electromagnetism, highlighting the mathematical differences between the two forces.
  • Another participant notes that while gravity and electromagnetism are linked to their respective theories, the differences between relativity and quantum mechanics are more nuanced, with general relativity focusing on curved space and quantum mechanics on probabilistic measurements.
  • There is mention of current research into gravitational waves and the concept of quantum gravity, which seeks to unify ideas from both theories.
  • One participant raises the question of why quantum gravity is considered necessary, given gravity's geometric nature, and inquires about the potential for particle/wave duality in a quantum gravity theory.
  • Another participant suggests that the concept of quantum gravity arose from attempts to apply quantum mechanics to general relativity, proposing the existence of a graviton as a theoretical messenger particle for gravity.
  • There is uncertainty expressed regarding the existence of the graviton and its implications for the probabilistic nature of gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the relationship between gravity and quantum mechanics, with no consensus reached on the necessity or implications of a quantum gravity theory.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the relationship between the theories and the challenges in reconciling their differing frameworks, but do not resolve the underlying assumptions or implications of their discussions.

Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
Are the differences between relativity and quantum mechanics due to the difference between gravity and electromagnatism?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pjpic said:
Are the differences between relativity and quantum mechanics due to the difference between gravity and electromagnatism?

Hi Pjpic! :smile:

From the PF Library on geodesic deviation (between world-lines free-falling under gravity) …

Geodesic deviation equation:

[tex]\frac{D^2\,\delta x^{\alpha}}{D\tau^2}\ =\ -\,R^{\alpha}_{\ \mu\beta\sigma}\,V^{\mu}\,V^{\sigma}\,\delta x^{\beta}[/tex]

for 4-velocity [itex]V[/itex] and gap [itex]\delta x[/itex]

where [itex]\tau[/itex] is proper time and [itex]R[/itex] is the Riemann curvature tensor

Electromagnetic comparison:

By comparison, the world-line deviation equation between world-lines followed by two charged particles with the same charge/mass ratio freely moving (in flat Minkowski spacetime) in an electromagnetic field is:

[tex]\frac{D^2\,\delta x^{\alpha}}{D\tau^2}\ =\ \frac{q}{m}\,F^{\alpha}_{\ \mu\,;\,\beta}\,V^{\mu}\,\delta x^{\beta}[/tex]

where [itex]q[/itex] is charge, [itex]m[/itex] is mass, and [itex]F[/itex] is the electromagnetic tensor
 
Pjpic said:
Are the differences between relativity and quantum mechanics due to the difference between gravity and electromagnatism?

I'm not sure what you mean by "differences" between these two theories, because they are afterall entirely different from one another. You're quite correct when you mention gravity and electromagnetism because they are intrinsically linked to relativity and quantum mechanics.

The differences between gravity and electromagnetism are obvious when looking at the Coulomb force or the gravitatonal force. The differences between relativity and quantum mechanics are a little more subtle. The main idea behind general relativity is to link the gravitational field in curved space to the results of special relativity. Quantum mechanics is about looking at the probabilistic uncertainties involved in measuring quantum phenomena. They are two different fields of investigation.

However, my research involves looking at gravitational waves. A very current topic is "quantum gravity", which tries to bring ideas together from both theories.

Hope this helps.
 
Hope this helps.[/QUOTE]

Yes, it does help; well written.

Why is it thought that there will be quantum gravity (if up to now gravity seems to be more of a geometric thing than a probability thing)?

Would a quantum gravity theory have the particle/wave duality element?
 
[/QUOTE]

Why is it thought that there will be quantum gravity (if up to now gravity seems to be more of a geometric thing than a probability thing)? [/QUOTE]

Well the whole idea of quantum gravity came about when people were trying to apply the ideas of quantum mechanics to general relativity. Contrary to popular belief, these two theories are comptiable, it is possible to show that the structure of general relativity follows from the quantum mechanics of a theoretical particle known as a graviton.

No one knows for sure whether this graviton exists or not but if we have a look at other other fundamental forcesin nature we find that they have one or more messenger particles. Gravity is the only one that doesn't, this leads people tobelieve it must be there in the form of this graviton.

You bring up an interesting point when you mention probability. I'm not sure about this but I'm guessing it would be probabilistic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K