What Excited State Was the Two-Times Ionized Lithium Initially In?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lithium
skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Two times ionized Lithium (Z=3) in excited states emits two photons, one with ##\lambda _1=72.91 nm## and another one with ##\lambda _2=13.5 nm##.
In which excited state was originally the ion?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Since two times ionized Lithium has only one electron I assume I can say that the energies of eigenstates are calculated as ##E_n=\frac{R_y}{n^2}##.

I somehow imagined that I have to sum the energy of photons and equal that with the expression above.

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}+\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}+R_y=R_y(1-\frac{1}{n^2})##

But this gives me some weird result...

What do I have to do? :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skrat said:
Since two times ionized Lithium has only one electron I assume I can say that the energies of eigenstates are calculated as ##E_n=\frac{R_y}{n^2}##.

I somehow imagined that I have to sum the energy of photons and equal that with the expression above.
That's not correct. The energy of one photon already corresponds to a transition between two levels: the difference between the initial excited state and the final state.

Start again from the equation for the energy, but consider one transition at a time. After that you will have to combine both transitions to get the desired solution.
 
Than first transition is:

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}=R_y(\frac{1}{(n')^2}-\frac{1}{(n)^2})##

and second

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}=R_y(1-\frac{1}{(n')^2})##

I hope that's exactly what you had in mind.

However, to get rid of ##(n')^2## I woud simply sum the both equation.

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}+\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}=R_y(1-\frac{1}{n^2})##
 
skrat said:
##\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}+\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}=R_y(1-\frac{1}{n^2})##
That looks ok. What do you get when you try to solve this for ##n##?

(Note: the problem is not clearly stated, and I misread it the first time. This explains why I might have made you rederive the equation you had at the beginning, although now without the extra ##R_y##.)
 
The next part confuses me the most...

##n^2=\left [1-\frac{hc}{R_y}(\frac{1}{\lambda _2}+\frac{1}{\lambda _1}) \right ]^{-1}##

which gives me ##n=0.378##
 
skrat said:
The next part confuses me the most...

##n^2=\left [1-\frac{hc}{R_y}(\frac{1}{\lambda _2}+\frac{1}{\lambda _1}) \right ]^{-1}##

which gives me ##n=0.378##

You're using the wrong Rydberg constant. It has to be scaled for the charge of the nucleus.
 
DrClaude said:
You're using the wrong Rydberg constant. It has to be scaled for the charge of the nucleus.

##R_y=13.6 eV##

How do I do that?

Lithum has 3 nucleus is than the right Rydberg constant multiplied by 3?
 
skrat said:
##R_y=13.6 eV##

How do I do that?

Lithum has 3 nucleus is than the right Rydberg constant multiplied by 3?

Do you have the equation for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen-like_atom
 
Ok, that's good to now.

So using ##Z^2R_y## gives me ##n=3##.

Thank you!
 
Back
Top