What Force Causes Drift Velocity Increase in Wires of Different Diameters?

AI Thread Summary
When current flows from a wire of greater diameter to one of lesser diameter, the drift velocity of electrons increases due to the inverse relationship between drift velocity and cross-sectional area. The equation I = venA illustrates that as the area (A) decreases, the drift velocity (v) must increase to maintain a constant current (I). This phenomenon is explained by the conservation of energy rather than an external force, drawing a parallel to Bernoulli's principle in fluid dynamics. The discussion emphasizes that the increase in drift velocity is a natural consequence of the geometry of the conductor. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing current flow in wires of varying diameters.
Himal kharel
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
consider two wires of different diameter. when current enters from that of greater diameter to lesser diameter drift velocity increases. which force causes it to increase?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it is really simple.
we have,current(I) through a conductor of the crossectional area of A is the product of the drift velocity(v) of the moving charges ,the area(A) and number of electrons(n)*the charge of a electron(e).hence
I=venA
or, v=I/(enA)
this relation shows that drift5 velocity is inversely proportional to the area of crosssection of the conductor.Hence if area decreases drift velocity increases.
HOPE THIS HELPS HIMAL
 
I don't think there's an external force involved, as it seems you have in mind, rather conservation of energy causes the drift velocity to increase, similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli%27s_principle" in fluid dynamics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top