What Force Keeps the Block from Sliding on a Frictionless Inclined Ramp?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block resting on a frictionless inclined ramp, with the ramp also on a table. The block and ramp have specified masses, and the inquiry revolves around the force required to keep the block from sliding as both the block and ramp accelerate together.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of forces on the block and ramp, questioning whether to use static or dynamic equations. There is consideration of the forces acting on the block due to gravity and the ramp's acceleration. Some participants suggest that the problem may be static, while others argue that the block is accelerating with the ramp.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring different interpretations of the forces involved. Some participants have offered insights into the nature of the forces acting on the block and ramp, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the system's dynamics. There is no explicit consensus, but productive dialogue is ongoing regarding the conditions under which the block remains stationary relative to the ramp.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of a frictionless surface and the conditions for static versus dynamic equilibrium. There is also a language barrier noted by one participant, which may affect the clarity of communication.

Copperhead2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block is at rest on a ramp on a table with no friction between the surfaces. The ramp has an incline of 30 degrees. The mass of the block is 4kg, and the mass of the wedge is 6kg. What magnitude force can be applied to the opposite side of the ramp such that both the ramp and the block accelerate without the block sliding?

Homework Equations


F = ma
m * gravity * sin(theta) = ma
normalForce = mg cos(theta)
forceByGravity = mgsin(theta) = ma
Force(block in x direction) = 4(-a) //negative a because it's going left.
Force(ramp in x direction) = 6(-a)

The Attempt at a Solution


My first thought was to figure out the acceleration the block would have without a push from the ramp (though since the block starts at rest I'm not sure how relevant this information is):
mgsin(theta) = ma
(4)(9.8)(sin30) = (4)a
a = 4.9 m/s^2
and that the force from the ramp would match up to have the same acceleration (i.e. F = ma = 6*(-4.9) ), but I think there's something conceptual about this that I'm not taking into account because I'm unable to explain exactly why that would work. Should the push force act similarly to friction in this model? What should I try to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That approach certainly seems doubtful.
Why not just apply the usual ΣF=ma to each body?
 
Maybe you did not realize that it is a static problem. The sum of all the forces it is not ## \sum F=m \cdot a ## but ## \sum F=0##.
 
q-bit said:
Maybe you did not realize that it is a static problem. The sum of all the forces it is not ## \sum F=m \cdot a ## but ## \sum F=0##.
Reread the question.
 
I understand that the ramp moves with acceleration creating a force that must neutralize the force (weight) which makes the block slide down. So the sum of forces acting on the block must be zero.

- Force one: From the acceleration applied on the ramp.
- Force two. From gravity on the block.
- Result: Block does not slide down because the sum of the forces is zero.

If the block was sliding down (or up) with some acceleration I would then use ##F= m \cdot a##, but not if it is quiet or with constant velocity.

Where is my mistake?
 
q-bit said:
So the sum of forces acting on the block must be zero.
The wedge is accelerating, the block is staying still relative to the wedge, and the sum of the forces on the block is zero... is that what you are saying? You might care to think about that some more.
 
I don't get your point, sorry. It's ok. It may be the language, English is not my mother tongue.
 
The block is actually accelerating at the same rate as the wedge ,therefore it has an acceleration equal to the wedge.
 
q-bit said:
I don't get your point, sorry. It's ok. It may be the language, English is not my mother tongue.
WinstonC said:
The block is actually accelerating at the same rate as the wedge ,therefore it has an acceleration equal to the wedge.
... and therefore the net force on it is not zero.
 
  • #10
You are putting the reference system on the table, I am putting it on the block. The equation is the same.
 
  • #11
q-bit said:
You are putting the reference system on the table, I am putting it on the block. The equation is the same.
Are you saying you are using a non-inertial reference frame?
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K