# What force keeps the planets orbiting normally?

• B
• r731
In summary: Newton in his second law of motion. It is the resistance of a body to change its state of motion.In summary, the planets in a K6 graph do not collapse to the center because there is a negligible force between each planet and the sun. This is because the force between each planet and the sun is what primarily determines the orbit of each planet.
r731
Let G be a graph where vertices are heavy planets and edges are forces between the incident vertices.

A complete graph K6 of six planets (of different masses) has 15 edges, why don't the planets collapse to the center?

Delta2 and davenn
What's the connection with physics?

russ_watters and davenn
Planets aren't arranged like that, for a start.

Essentially, orbits work because the objects are moving fast enough that their paths curve towards the Sun at the exact rate they need to move in a circle (or ellipse, more usually). Newton provided a plausibility argument (nice explanation and animations at Wikipedia), and developed the detailed maths.

Last edited:
russ_watters and davenn
r731 said:
Let G be a graph where vertices are heavy planets and edges are forces between the incident vertices.

A complete graph K6 of six planets (of different masses) has 15 edges, why don't the planets collapse to the center?
Well the forces between planets are considered "kind of" negligible (because their mass isn't so big in relation to the vast distance that separates the planets) and they don't affect a lot the orbit of the planets, it is the force between each planet and the sun that primarily determines the orbit of each planet.

r731 and Ibix
r731 said:
A complete graph K6 of six planets (of different masses) has 15 edges, why don't the planets collapse to the center?

Let's say "planet" means planet-like object. If you arrange them this way, then they need to have a tangential velocity in order to prevent them from collapsing into the center. If you have n "planets" with the identical mass m at the positions

##r_i = R \cdot \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\cos \varphi _i } \\ {\sin \varphi _i } \\ \end{array}} \right)##

with

##\varphi _i = 2 \cdot \pi \cdot \frac{i}{n}##

they would be accelerated with

##\ddot r_i = G \cdot m \cdot \sum\limits_{j \ne i} {\frac{{r_j - r_i }}{{\left| {r_j - r_i } \right|^3 }}} ##

towards the center and would need to move with the speed

##\left| {\dot r} \right| = \sqrt {R \cdot \left| {\ddot r} \right|} ##

to remain on a circular path.

However, such a configuration is not stable. This example with 6 Jupiter-like objects in a common orbit of 1 AU turns into chaos after 5 revolutions:

https://tinyurl.com/ybw8kyhv

r731 and Buzz Bloom
@r731 planets/objects generally don't fall into the sun while orbiting it because of centrifugal force which counteracts gravity and keeps them in balance. The same reason why satellites can orbit Earth and not fall down.

In fact centrifugal force is a way by which one can produce "artificial gravity" because the force that pushes on clothes that rotates within a centrifuge washing machine is identical to gravity.

http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/~pfrancis/roleplay/MysteryPlanet/Orbits/

davenn, Vanadium 50, weirdoguy and 2 others
artis said:
because of centrifugal force

Which exists only in non-inertial frames. I find it risky to explain things by using inertial forces because people usually don't understand them properly.

DrStupid, Delta2 and Ibix
artis said:
@r731 planets/objects generally don't fall into the sun while orbiting it because of centrifugal force which counteracts gravity and keeps them in balance.

Newton's second law applies to planetary orbits with the gravitational force only; there is no counterbalancing centrifugal force. In Newtonian physics, gravity acts as a centripetal force.

If we apply general relativity, then there are no forces acting on the planets, gravitational, centrifugal or otherwise.

Klystron
@PeroK @weirdoguy
Ok I agree , not the best explanation one could give. Pardon.
Gravity being the invisible "string" that provides centripetal force to keep planets in circular orbits should of have sufficed.

There's no single force that can keep planets in orbit around the Sun. Gravity and inertia are two major forces that do it, and gravity is the major one.

SpaceJacob said:
Gravity and inertia are two major forces

Since when inertia is a force?

russ_watters, Vanadium 50, Delta2 and 2 others

## What force keeps the planets orbiting normally?

The force that keeps the planets orbiting normally is called centripetal force. This is the force that pulls an object towards the center of its circular path.

## How does centripetal force work?

Centripetal force works by continuously pulling the planets towards the center of their orbit, preventing them from flying off into space.

## What causes centripetal force?

The centripetal force that keeps the planets orbiting normally is caused by the gravitational pull of the sun. The sun's massive size and gravitational force keeps the planets in their orbits.

## What would happen if centripetal force stopped working?

If centripetal force stopped working, the planets would no longer be held in their orbits and would fly off into space in a straight line. This would result in chaos and the destruction of the solar system as we know it.

## Do all planets have the same centripetal force?

No, the amount of centripetal force required for a planet to maintain its orbit depends on its mass and distance from the sun. The larger the mass of the planet, the greater the centripetal force needed to keep it in orbit. Similarly, the farther a planet is from the sun, the weaker the centripetal force needed to keep it in orbit.

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K