What form of energy is lost when a planet changes orbit?

AI Thread Summary
When a planet like Mars changes its orbit, it primarily exchanges potential energy for kinetic energy, especially when moving in an elliptical orbit. The energy remains constant overall, but any energy change typically occurs due to external factors, such as collisions with other celestial bodies. Unlike charged particles that lose energy through electromagnetic radiation, planets do not lose energy in this way during orbital changes. The discussion emphasizes that energy loss in planetary motion is contingent on the cause of the orbital change rather than being a self-initiated process. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending the mechanics of planetary motion.
Parbat
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In case Mars jumps from it's orbit to earth's,then will it lose it's energy
in electromagnetic radiation form or something else happens?
I found from Doc AL that only charged particle loses energy in electromagnetic form.Then in which form will it lose it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In your scenario what made Mars jump?
 
lets not talk about 'mars jumping'.In a eliptical orbit,the planets have a different energy & when the planet moves from higher energy position to lower energy position,in which form does it lose it?Is it electromagnetic or something else?
 
In an elliptical orbit the satellite speeds up as it moves closer in, exchanging potential energy for kinetic energy.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
In an elliptical orbit the satellite speeds up as it moves closer in, exchanging potential energy for kinetic energy.

u mean energy remains constant.
But if there is any energy change takes place,how will the planets lose it?
 
It depends on what causes the change to take place, such as a collision with another body. It doesn't take place by itself, in contrast with charged particles.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Back
Top