What goes into a capable math mind?

  • Thread starter Thread starter onnyctip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mind
onnyctip
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys. I'm a high school drop-out. I went back and got a General Education Development degree. I'm also doing grade twelve courses because I want to goto university and study engineering. My math is very weak but I feel if I work hard I can catch up.

Right now I'm doing "Calculus and Vectors" and "Advanced Functions" at the high school level. So let's say a great mathematician's knowledge is like a pyrimad. At the base are basics and higher up are more advanced areas that are built up from the base...

I'm thinking it goes something like:

Numbers, simple operations and arithmetic

then calculus and using higher notations

then near the top are concepts like Fourier analysis and functions.

What should I know in terms of subjects?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, the "hierarchy of mathematics" is about which topics rely on the results of other topics. Thinking of it that way,

1. Set theory, logic, operations on sets (cardinality, denumerability, Cartesian product)
2. Definitions and properties of fundamental number systems (natural numbers, integers, rationals, reals, complex numbers); arithmetic; algebra
3. General functions on sets, and functions of real variables; elementary algebraic and transcendental functions (exponential, log, trigonometric)
4. Linear algebra (vector spaces, matrices, linear mappings)
5. Sequences of numbers and real analysis
6. Calculus of functions of one real variable (limits, continuity, derivative, integral, series); and later, complex variables

I think from here, one is ready to tackle a lot of different branches of mathematics: you can head down the real/complex analysis and topology route, abstract algebra, combinatorics/discrete math, geometry (differential, Euclidean and non-Euclidean), applied math (probability and statistics, optimization). The list goes on.

By the way, are you in Ontario, maybe?
 
Dr. Seafood said:
In my opinion, the "hierarchy of mathematics" is about which topics rely on the results of other topics. Thinking of it that way,

1. Set theory, logic, operations on sets (cardinality, denumerability, Cartesian product)
2. Definitions and properties of fundamental number systems (natural numbers, integers, rationals, reals, complex numbers); arithmetic; algebra
3. General functions on sets, and functions of real variables; elementary algebraic and transcendental functions (exponential, log, trigonometric)
4. Linear algebra (vector spaces, matrices, linear mappings)
5. Sequences of numbers and real analysis
6. Calculus of functions of one real variable (limits, continuity, derivative, integral, series); and later, complex variables

I think from here, one is ready to tackle a lot of different branches of mathematics: you can head down the real/complex analysis and topology route, abstract algebra, combinatorics/discrete math, geometry (differential, Euclidean and non-Euclidean), applied math (probability and statistics, optimization). The list goes on.

By the way, are you in Ontario, maybe?

Yes, Ottawa. I'm guessing the course names give it away?

Thanks for your info btw!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top