What happen to rocket travelling @ 0.8c

  • Thread starter Thread starter Manula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket
Manula
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
We all know that any biological or an other chemical activity occurring inside a rocket traveling at 0.8c appear to be slower to an external observer.
Then the rate of combustion of fuel in the rocket should also be reduced according to that.
Then what prevents the rocket from slowing down according to that...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Manula said:
We all know that any biological or an other chemical activity occurring inside a rocket traveling at 0.8c appear to be slower to an external observer.
Then the rate of combustion of fuel in the rocket should also be reduced according to that.
Then what prevents the rocket from slowing down according to that...

If the rocket is traveling at a constant speed of .8c (or any other constant speed) there's no combustion of fuel going on at all - the motors are switched off and the rocket is coasting at a constant speed (no friction in outer space, remember) without slowing down.

Fire up the motors, and the rocket will start accelerating and increasing its speed. Now the math becomes a bit more complicated (so I would advise you to get comfortable with the constant-speed math first) but at a hand-waving level... Yes, effects such as the rate of combustion being reduced according to an external observer will conspire so that the rocket's speed will not increase without limit - indeed, the rocket won't be able to quite reach the speed of light relative to the external observer, no matter how long and hard the motors fire.
 
Nugatory said:
Yes, effects such as the rate of combustion being reduced according to an external observer will conspire so that the rocket's speed will not increase without limit
Isn't the force from the rocket engine frame invariant? I would think that the slower burn rate is exactly compensated by the increase of the fuel's inertia, so the thrust stays the same. But the increase in inertia also prevents that constant force from accelerating the rocket to c.
 
Last edited:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top