What happens if you only get 1 solution to a 2nd Order Diff EQ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Diff eq
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of obtaining a single solution from a second-order differential equation, particularly focusing on cases where repeated roots occur in the auxiliary equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of solutions when encountering repeated roots in the auxiliary equation, discussing the general form of the solution and the application of initial conditions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the general solution form associated with repeated roots, while others are questioning the validity of their methods and interpretations. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific equations and roots, but the discussion is framed around the general principles of solving second-order differential equations with repeated roots, without reaching a definitive conclusion.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, I'm slightly confused on this problem, when i factored it and solved for r, i came out with only 1 answer, r = -13/72
Here is my problem and work:
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/685/lastscan15uk.jpg

:biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you get repeated roots in your auxilary equation, e.g.

[tex]y^{\prime\prime}-2y^{\prime}+1=0[/tex]

has the auxilary equation

[tex]r^{2}-2r+1=0[/tex] so [tex](r-1)^2=0[/tex]

and hence r=1 (with multiplicity 2) so the general solution is of the form

[tex]y=Ae^t+Bte^t[/tex]

The roots of the equation

[tex]5184r^2+1827r+169=0[/tex]

are [tex]r=-\frac{13}{72}[/tex] (with multiplicity 2) so your general solution is of the form...
 
Last edited:
One way to see why the method proposed by Benorin is valid would be to write your solution as

[tex]y = A e^{r_1 t} + B e^{r_2 t}[/tex]


and apply the initial conditions to determine the coefficients. Then let [itex]r_2[/itex] approach [itex]r_1 = r[/itex] (the root of your actual equation). Usually, l'Hopital's Rule can be applied to yield Benorin's solution.
 
Thanks guys, i don't know if its right or not, but i think my method is right:
http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/6219/lastscan0ku.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K