I What happens in the molecular structure of a liquid (imcompressible)?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the behavior of an incompressible liquid, it is noted that when a liquid like milk falls, its potential energy converts to kinetic energy, potentially raising the temperature at the bottom of the container due to increased molecular motion. The pressure at the base of the cylinder is determined by the weight of the fluid above, following the equation P2 = P1 + ρgh, where density remains constant for incompressible fluids. During free fall, there is no pressure difference between the top and bottom of the liquid, and the density and volume do not change. The concept of static versus total temperature is introduced, highlighting that the average kinetic energy of the molecules influences temperature. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the unique properties of incompressible fluids in relation to pressure and temperature during free fall.
MagnusChases
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a liquid with high potential energy at a height [H] in a first moment. In a second moment, the liquid loses its potential energy (that is converted into kinetic energy) and fall in a cylinder at height [h] .IF the liquid is incompressible what happens with the molecules in the cylinder's base(Does the temperature rises up a little, because of the kinetic energy? How does the pressure rise up, if the liquid is incompressible?I am an undergraduate student and was discussing this problem with my colleague. Something important is missing. (Maybe we are having a problem because it is a liquid, not a gas)

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have a glass of incompressible milk on the edge of the table and the cat comes and pushed the glass off.
Does the temperature of the milk rise as its falling?
 
  • Like
Likes MagnusChases
256bits said:
So you have a glass of incompressible milk on the edge of the table and the cat comes and pushed the glass off.
Does the temperature of the milk rise as its falling?

Yes. When the milk falls in the cylinder, will the temperature of the bottom be greater than the surface? What causes the pressure in the bottom given the initial conditions(liquid incompressible)?
 
MagnusChases said:
Yes. When the milk falls in the cylinder, will the temperature of the bottom be greater than the surface? What causes the pressure in the bottom given the initial conditions(liquid incompressible)?
What causes the pressure - the weight of the fluid above.

For an incompressible fluid P2 = P1 + γh = P1 + ρgh
where P2 is the pressure at the depth h, P1 is the pressure at the top, γ is the specific weight and is a constant for incompressible fluids - the density does not change, nor the volume. We also assume g, gravity, is a constant for the difference in elevation.

When the fluid drops, it is in free fall, there is no pressure difference between top and bottom, the density and gamma and volume are the same as the initial condition of right before the fall.

With these assumptions, should the temperature at the bottom and top differ during free fall, from before, or not?

I think what is bothering you is the ideal gas equation. PV = nRT.
If P2 is different from P1, and the volume is constant, then the only other STATE variable that can change is T, thus T2 is different from T1.
I capitalized a hint.

You might find more hints here, between compressible and incompressible fluids.
http://users.metu.edu.tr/csert/me582/ME582 Ch 01.pdf
PS - I won't be back for a quite a few hours, so perhaps someone else will chime into help you out.
 
MagnusChases said:
When the milk falls in the cylinder, will the temperature of the bottom be greater than the surface?
To be clear, we are talking about a glass of un-disturbed milk in free fall in mid-air as it approaches the floor? We are not talking about the milk after the glass has shattered and the milk is still splashing?

The temperature of the milk relates to the average kinetic energy of its component molecules in the frame of reference where there is no net momentum.

Technically, the sort of temperature described above is "static temperature". One can also consider "total temperature" which includes the kinetic energy from the bulk motion of the fluid.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top