What happens to a spinning rod with a ball inside?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adikshith Ojha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario involving a hollow massless rod with a ball inside, the ball will remain at the center if it starts there and the rod is spun on a table. When the rod is thrown vertically with rotational and translational motion, the ball will also stay at the center as long as their initial velocities match. The discussion emphasizes that the mass of the rod is crucial for understanding the forces at play, as a massless rod cannot exert force on the ball. If the ball starts at one end, its behavior may differ based on the angular velocity and gravitational forces involved. Overall, precise definitions of the scenarios are necessary for accurate predictions of motion.
Adikshith Ojha
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
OK, this is not a homework problem, I was simply fooling around when I conjured this up. And I guess I must include that I'm only a beginner to physics so my knowledge is limited. Now, for the questions.
Say there is a hollow massless rod, and inside it you have a ball of certain mass, the radius of the ball is equal to that of the rod and there is no friction between the two surfaces. Now if I were to keep it on a table and give it a spin, will the ball remain in centre or stick to one of the ends of the rod? My intuition tells me it would stick to one end but I'm not 100℅ sure about it. OK, now for the real one, now consider the same rod and throw it keeping it vertically in such a way it does a combined rotational and translational motion, does the ball keep going up and down as the rod spins? Or again, does it stick to one end? I'll again guess here that if I give it a certain angular velocity such that the centrifugal force overcomes the gravitational force, it would stick to one end (keep in mind that I have assumed the ball to be in one of the ends when the motion is just about to begin, does it change if the ball is at the centre when the motion is just about to begin?) Assuming my guess to be correct, say I give it an angular velocity that is not enough to overcome gravitational force, I assume the ball keeps moving from one end to the other as the rod rotates, so essentially, the centre of mass is... Oscillating?... Anyway, What would be the motion described by the body in such a case? And if my guess is wrong, how would the motion be? I know that I have posed quite a few questions but I would be very grateful if I could get the answers for them. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to give the rod a mass, otherwise its presence in the problem becomes irrelevant, since once the motion is underway it cannot impart any force on the ball - a massless object cannot impart a force on a massive object unless the former is firmly attached to a different massive object (eg a massless cricket bat held by a massive batsman can impart a force on a massive ball).

It seems by implication that you are assuming the ball starts off in the centre of the rod, although you do not clearly state that. I will assume it is initially in the centre. Answers may differ if it is not.

In the first situation on the table the ball will remain in the centre.

In the second situation, as long as the initial velocity of the centre of mass of the rod is the same as that of the ball, the ball will remain in the centre.

I don't understand what you mean by your third scenario. It needs a more precise description.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top