What happens to matter that falls into a black hole?

AI Thread Summary
Matter falling into a black hole accelerates towards the event horizon, where gravitational forces become extreme, leading to the perception that it never actually crosses this boundary from an outside observer's perspective. While the relativistic equations suggest that matter could attain infinite energy and mass, this does not imply that black holes contain infinite mass; they have finite masses that have been measured. The phenomenon of time dilation means that as an object approaches the event horizon, time appears to slow down for distant observers, making it seem like the object never fully crosses the horizon. This does not violate conservation laws, as the mass and energy of matter falling into a black hole are accounted for within the black hole's finite mass. Ultimately, the complexities of black holes challenge our understanding of physics, but they do not lead to an infinite amount of unseen matter in the universe.
JohnnyTheFox
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey, my first post here, glad I've found somewhere on the internet to discus this crazy stuff!

Anyway here's my question:

Matter falling into a black hole accelerates towards it under its gravity, towards the "event horizon" (or Rs=2GM/c^2)

The relativistic version of the law of gravity is F=GM/r^2*[1/(1-Rs/r)] so at the event horizon the force becomes infinite so then the speed of matter falling in can become the speed of light given infinite enegry, so it also has infinite mass?
But from outside nothing ever crosses this border as we see it getting slower and slower so it never acctuly touches it. But according to the matter it passes this and then on inside the black hole.

My question is assuming all of this, does that mean at some point there is an infinite amount of matter in the universe that we cannot see? It's all conveniently hidden behind the event horizon. So does this not violate the laws of conservation in a way, there suddenly being infinitley more enegry in the universe?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
JohnnyTheFox said:
Hey, my first post here, glad I've found somewhere on the internet to discus this crazy stuff!

Anyway here's my question:

Matter falling into a black hole accelerates towards it under its gravity, towards the "event horizon" (or Rs=2GM/c^2)

The relativistic version of the law of gravity is F=GM/r^2*[1/(1-Rs/r)] so at the event horizon the force becomes infinite so then the speed of matter falling in can become the speed of light given infinite enegry, so it also has infinite mass?
But from outside nothing ever crosses this border as we see it getting slower and slower so it never acctuly touches it. But according to the matter it passes this and then on inside the black hole.

My question is assuming all of this, does that mean at some point there is an infinite amount of matter in the universe that we cannot see? It's all conveniently hidden behind the event horizon. So does this not violate the laws of conservation in a way, there suddenly being infinitley more enegry in the universe?
The "force" at the event horizon isn't infinite, it is just exactly enough to happen to equal the (gravitional pull) of the escape velocity of the speed of light. No matter and/or photons drawn into a BH have infinite energy (= infinite mass) so no, there is no BH with an infinite mass.

In fact, quite a few BH candidates have been measured with various, finite, masses up to the largest one (I know of) in the center of the elliptical galaxy M87 at ~3 billion Ms.
 
Your question one. Ther ehas been a lot of confusion over the years about what happens when something falls into a black hole. The best answer is this: The object falls in according to the equations for a falling body. The problem is with what a faraway observer sees. The gravitation of a black hole is so great that time slows down in its vicinity.

If you imagine a flashing light on the falling object that flashes once every second, seconds pass slower and slower as the object approaches the hole. So they become farther and farther apart from the distant point of view. As the event horizon is approached, the flashes become so far apart that it seems like the object has stopped.

I probably don't explain this very well. Search the net on black holes and you should find an explanation somewhere.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top