What Happens to Photon Momentum When Light Travels Through Different Mediums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyerpower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Momentum
flyerpower
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
So, photons have zero rest mass, but they never stand still so they have momentum at the speed of light, i quite understand that, and i think it can be derived from this:

[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/2/d/d2dec44ba56c41a31b4d334b144b51d6.png[/URL]
[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/c/3/9c3f2777ac6cb5f4c9c1edc647c68311.png[/URL]

If we plug in v=c in the gamma factor then it turns out that light has some momentum p=(0*c)/0 which is a constant.
But c is the speed of light in vacuum, what if light travels through a medium in which light travels slower than c, then p=(0*v)/gamma, where gamma is not 0 so p=0.

What is going wrong here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's wrong with that is that 0/0 is NOT equal to 1. It does not exist; you cannot divide by 0.
As for non-vacuum, it isn't quite right to say that the speed of light is slower. More precisely, light moves at the speed of light (in vacuum) between atoms, is absorbed by an atom, then, a tiny time later, is ejected from the atom so that the average speed through the material is slower.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
flyerpower said:
So, photons have zero rest mass, but they never stand still so they have momentum at the speed of light, i quite understand that, and i think it can be derived from this:

[PLAIN]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/2/d/d2dec44ba56c41a31b4d334b144b51d6.png[/QUOTE]
That formula only applies to massive particles, for which the speed v is always less than c. For photons, momentum is given by p = E/c (where E is the energy).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
What's wrong with that is that 0/0 is NOT equal to 1. It does not exist; you cannot divide by 0.

If we plug x=1 in (x-1)/(x^2-1) = 0/0, if we plug in x=0.9 it returns ~0.52, and for x=1.1 it returns ~0.47, and if we want the defined value for that when we plug x=1, we reduce the expression to 1/(x+1) which gives 0.5, so it's a constant. Wouldn't it work in that case too?
 
I've found a number of interesting-sounding papers on the topic of the momentum of light in a refractive medium. Frustratingly, I can't access them in their entirety. Amongst what I found are:

"The momentum of light in a refractive medium" , Peierls, two papers
http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/347/1651/475.abstract http://www.jstor.org/pss/79058 http://www.jstor.org/pss/79317

Also, a more recent http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v104/i7/e070401 (and a physicsworld.com article citing it that was ... not very well written.)

Peierls makes the interesting observation that it's not only light that caries the momentum when an electromagnetic wave travels through a medium - motion of the atoms in the medium (or of the medium itself in the continuum approximation) are also generated, in particular acoustic waves (which I assume could also considered to be phonons).

It'd be nice to see a full treatment of the problem that was accessible.

[add]http://www.opticsinfobase.org/aop/abstract.cfm?uri=aop-2-4-519 also looks interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top